Xiaomi Poco X3 GT vs Samsung Galaxy A33 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 19, 2021 April 20, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 110.31 cm³ 95.72 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 193 g 186 g
Height 163.3 mm 159.7 mm
Width 75.9 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cloud White
  • Stargaze Black
  • Wave Blue
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 411 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.33 mAh/cm³ 52.23 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT and the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G. Both phones are compelling mid-range contenders, but they target slightly different user needs. Here’s my breakdown, focusing on the practical implications of each specification.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 GTSamsung Galaxy A33 5GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm159.7 x 74 x 8.1 mmPoco X3 GT is larger and slightly bulkier; A33 5G is more compact and pocketable.
Weight193g186gA33 5G is a touch lighter, possibly more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.6"6.4"Poco X3 GT offers a bit more screen real estate, better for media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both offer sharp visuals; no difference here.
Pixel Density399 PPI411 PPISimilar clarity; negligible real-world difference.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDA33 5G has superior contrast, deeper blacks, and better color saturation, especially for HDR content.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzPoco X3 GT provides smoother scrolling and animations, ideal for gaming and fast-paced content.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have identical peak brightness; data missing.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm)Exynos 1280 (5 nm)Dimensity 1100 offers significantly higher benchmark performance; A33 5G is more energy-efficient.
AnTuTu Score745,283475,448Poco X3 GT is much faster for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps.
GPUMali-G77 MC9Mali-G68Poco X3 GT has a more powerful GPU for graphics-intensive tasks and games.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.79, 1/2", 0.7µm48MP, f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8µmPoco X3 GT has higher resolution but smaller pixels; A33 5G has larger pixels, better in low light.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.4513MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06", 1.12µmA33 5G's front camera has a wider aperture for better low-light performance.
Wide Angle LensN/A8MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", 1.12µmA33 5G has a dedicated wide-angle lens, enhancing versatility for group photos and landscapes.
Portrait/Depth LensN/A2MP, f/2.4A33 5G has a depth lens, enhancing bokeh effect for portraits.
Macro LensN/A5MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.12µmA33 5G features a macro lens for close-up photography.
Video StabilityNoYesA33 5G has better video stabilization.
DxoMark Score-85 (overall)A33 5G has a benchmarked camera score, while X3 GT has no known benchmark
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacity should provide comparable battery life.
Charging67W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingPoco X3 GT charges much faster, reducing downtime.
Battery FeaturesNon-removableBypass Charging, Non-removableA33 5G has bypass charging for reduced heat generation during charging while gaming.
Other
WiFiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5Poco X3 GT supports faster and more reliable Wi-Fi connections for compatible routers.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2Bluetooth 5.1Poco X3 GT has a newer version with improvements in energy efficiency.
OSAndroid 11Android 12, upgradable to 16A33 5G comes with a newer Android version and promises longer software support.
Storage128/256GB128/256GBBoth have same internal storage options; no expandable storage.
RAM8GB6/8GBBoth offer good multitasking capabilities.
Audio QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersPoco X3 GT provides enhanced audio quality features.
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass VictusGorilla Glass 5Poco X3 GT is more resistant to scratches and accidental damage.

2. Key Insights

  • Xiaomi Poco X3 GT: This phone is a performance beast. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset paired with the 120Hz display makes it significantly faster for gaming, heavy multitasking, and demanding apps. The 67W fast charging is also a major advantage, letting you quickly top up the battery.
  • Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: This device shines in display quality and versatility. The AMOLED display provides superior visuals, and the inclusion of a wide-angle, macro, and depth sensor for photography offers more creative options. The A33 also provides better video stability, something lacking from the X3 GT, plus longer software support.

Trade-offs and Limitations:

  • The Poco X3 GT lacks an AMOLED screen, so you are sacrificing color vibrancy and contrast. The camera system is less versatile without the dedicated macro, and wide angle.
  • The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G does not offer the same level of raw performance as the Poco X3 GT. The charging is also notably slower, at 25W.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Xiaomi Poco X3 GT:
    • Best For: Gamers, power users, and anyone who values raw performance.
    • Use Cases: High-intensity gaming, smooth multitasking, fast app loading, media consumption on the go with less care on display quality.
    • Value: Offers excellent performance for the price.
  • Samsung Galaxy A33 5G:
    • Best For: Photography enthusiasts, content creators, and users who prioritize a great display.
    • Use Cases: Taking diverse photos, enjoying high-quality video content, browsing, everyday social media use, extended use (bypass charging).
    • Value: Solid performance with superior visual and photographic capabilities.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide between these two phones:

  1. Do you prioritize raw performance or display quality and versatility in your camera?
    • If you need the highest frame rates and fastest performance, choose the Poco X3 GT.
    • If you value a better screen and a more versatile camera setup, choose the Galaxy A33 5G.
  2. Is fast charging a critical factor for you?
    • If fast charging is essential for your daily routine, the Poco X3 GT's 67W charging is much faster than the Galaxy A33 5G's 25W charging.
  3. Do you need better support and regular updates?
    • If you value regular updates, including features and security, the A33 is better since it will receive up to Android 16, while the X3 GT has reached its end of life cycle.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer on a budget: Choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT for its superior processing power and 120Hz refresh rate.
  • Everyday user who loves photography: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G for its versatile camera system and vibrant AMOLED display.
  • Heavy multimedia user with long commutes: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G for its AMOLED display, longer software support and bypass charging for long gaming sessions.

My Choice

If it were my money, I'd lean towards the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G. While the Poco X3 GT is a raw performance champ, the A33's AMOLED display and versatile camera system simply offer a richer, more enjoyable everyday experience. The wider variety of features, better build quality, longer software support, and good battery capacity with bypass charging make it more compelling to me. I appreciate the balance it offers between performance, features and a great user experience for daily tasks and media consumption, while still offering a good enough experience when gaming.

Ultimately, both phones are excellent options in the mid-range category. Your choice should come down to how you plan to use your phone and which features you prioritize.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.