Xiaomi Poco X3 GT vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date August 19, 2021 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 110.31 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 193 g 185 g
Height 163.3 mm 164.6 mm
Width 75.9 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cloud White
  • Stargaze Black
  • Wave Blue
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.33 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT and the Realme C65. On paper, they seem like they occupy different performance tiers, but let’s break it down and see how these differences play out in real life.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here’s a detailed look at the specs, framed by how they’d affect your daily usage:

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 GTRealme C65Real-World Implications
Design
Size163.3 × 75.9 × 8.9 mm164.6 × 76.1 × 7.6 mmC65 slightly taller and thinner; X3 GT is slightly more bulky but could feel more substantial.
Weight193g185gRealme C65 is slightly lighter, which might be more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.6"6.67"Both have comparable screen sizes, difference is negligible.
Resolution1080x2400720x1604X3 GT: Sharper, clearer visuals; C65: Lower resolution, potentially less crisp text/images.
PPI399264X3 GT: Much higher pixel density, leading to finer details, clearer text, less pixelation.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth have identical display technology.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzX3 GT: Smoother scrolling and animations, a better feel in use.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have the same peak brightness of 0 nits, a spec that does not make sense. The actual brightness performance of both is not known with current data.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)X3 GT: Significantly faster, more efficient, better for gaming and demanding apps; C65: More suited for basic tasks.
AnTuTu Score745,283225,154X3 GT: Shows significantly better app loading, smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and more future-proof.
GPUMali-G77 MC9Mali-G52 MC2X3 GT: Superior graphics performance, which is important for gaming.
Camera
Main Camera64MP f/1.79, 1/2", 0.70µm50MP f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µmX3 GT: Higher resolution, larger sensor, wider aperture for better low-light and more detailed images.
Selfie Camera16MP f/2.458MP f/2.0X3 GT: Sharper selfies; C65: Wider aperture, might perform slightly better in low-light.
Portrait CameraNone2MP f/2.4C65: Dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode effects.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps1080p@30fpsX3 GT: Supports 4K video recording and slow-motion; C65 limited to 1080p.
Features4K Video, Triple, Ultra stable, RAW, NightDual, PDAFX3 GT: More advanced video and photography features including better low-light performance, editing capabilities; C65: Basic Camera Features
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer similar battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life.
Charging67W Fast Charging45W Fast ChargingX3 GT: Significantly faster charging, less downtime waiting for charge.
FeaturesNon-removableNon-removableBoth devices have non-removable batteries
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 14C65: Newer OS which provides the latest features and better software support.
Connectivity
WiFiWiFi 6802.11nX3 GT: Faster Wi-Fi for data transfers and downloads.
Bluetooth5.2 LE5.0 LEX3 GT: Newer Bluetooth version; Both support advanced audio distribution; X3 GT: Supports advanced audio codecs; C65: Supports enhanced data rate and human interface profile
GPSMulti Satellite SupportMulti Satellite SupportX3 GT: Supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy
SIMDual SIM Dual StandbyDual SIM Dual StandbyBoth devices support Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)
Storage
Internal Storage128GB or 256GB128GB or 256GBBoth devices come in two similar storage options
RAM8GB6GB or 8GBBoth offer a similar RAM capacity, good for multitasking
Expandable StorageNoneNoneNeither of the devices support expandable storage
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersBasic AudioX3 GT: Much better audio experience, great for media consumption; C65: Basic Audio Features
Security
FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprintSide-mounted fingerprintBoth phones have a side mounted finger print sensor.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass VictusUnknownX3 GT: Significantly more protection for the screen
Sensors
FeaturesGyroscope, Ultrasonic Proximity VirtualProximityX3 GT: Has a more comprehensive sensor suite suitable for gaming and AR applications.

2. Key Insights

  • Xiaomi Poco X3 GT: This phone is a performance powerhouse. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset paired with a 120Hz display, faster charging, and superior camera setup, makes it great for demanding users like gamers and media consumers. The inclusion of Gorilla Glass Victus is a welcome addition for added durability. However, it's a bit older with an older Android version which may result in it losing out on features found on newer Android versions.

  • Realme C65: The C65 is more about affordability and the latest Android version. It’s slimmer and lighter, making it a decent option for basic tasks and daily use. However, its processor and camera setup are geared toward more casual users. The lower resolution screen will result in less crisp image quality compared to the X3 GT.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Xiaomi Poco X3 GT:

    • Best for: Gamers, media enthusiasts, and power users who need robust performance and features.
    • Use Case: Playing graphically intensive games, editing videos on the go, consuming high-resolution content, enjoying high-quality audio.
  • Realme C65:

    • Best for: Casual users, those on a budget, and people who prioritize software updates.
    • Use Case: Browsing social media, everyday communication, light gaming, and capturing simple photos and videos.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to help you choose:

  1. How important is gaming and performance to you?

    • If you want top-tier performance, go for the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT.
    • If your needs are basic, the Realme C65 will be more than enough.
  2. Do you prioritize a sharper display and higher quality camera?

    • If yes, the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT is the clear choice with a better display and camera system.
    • If you are okay with a standard display and a decent camera, the Realme C65 will suffice.
  3. How important is a thinner, lighter device with the latest Android OS versus screen protection?

    • If you want a thinner and lighter device and prioritize being on the latest version of android, then you should go with the Realme C65.
    • If you need more screen protection, then the Poco X3 GT would be a better choice.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two devices, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT. While the Realme C65 has its merits, specifically in terms of being lighter and having the latest Android version, the sheer performance gap of the X3 GT is too significant to ignore. As someone who is regularly engaging in resource-intensive tasks, and would like a device that does not lag behind, the X3 GT's processing power, significantly better camera, faster charging, and higher refresh rate display would be much more important to me. It's a phone that delivers a noticeably more premium experience, and for me, the trade-off of having an older Android version is acceptable, as the overall user experience it provides is better for me.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.