Xiaomi Poco X3 GT vs Oppo Reno12 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 19, 2021 June 18, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 110.31 cm³ 89.39 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 193 g 180 g
Height 163.3 mm 161.5 mm
Width 75.9 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cloud White
  • Stargaze Black
  • Wave Blue
  • Space Brown
  • Sunset Gold
  • Nebula Silver
  • Manish Malhotra

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 89.4 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.33 mAh/cm³ 55.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT and the Oppo Reno12 Pro. I'll be looking at these phones from an engineering perspective, translating the specs into real-world experiences to help you decide which one is right for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed table comparing the key specifications of the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT and the Oppo Reno12 Pro, focusing on their real-world implications:

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 GTOppo Reno12 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm161.5 x 74.8 x 7.4 mmThe Oppo is noticeably slimmer and lighter, making it more comfortable to hold for long periods and slip into pockets.
Weight193g180gThe 13g difference may not seem huge, but it translates to a lighter feel in hand, particularly during extended usage.
Display
Size6.6"6.7"The Oppo offers a slightly larger screen, which can be preferable for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution1080x24001080x2412Both phones have sharp screens, good for detailed images and text.
PPI399394Pixel density is very similar on both, resulting in comparable clarity.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDAMOLED technology on the Oppo means richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency for dark themes; better viewing experience overall.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzSmooth scrolling and animations will be comparable on both; great for gaming and fast-paced content.
Brightness0 nits1400 nitsThe Oppo's significantly higher brightness makes it much more usable in direct sunlight and outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)The Xiaomi's chipset has a higher benchmark score, but the Oppo's chipset is more modern, based on a more efficient architecture, potentially leading to better battery management; similar processing power for most daily tasks.
AnTuTu Score745,283702,140Xiaomi shows slightly better raw performance in benchmarks but in real-world use, both are snappy.
GPUMali-G77 MC9Mali-G615 MC2Both GPUs are capable for most tasks but the Xiaomi GPU is slightly more powerful for gaming.
Camera
Rear Standard Camera64MP (f/1.79)50MP (f/1.8)Xiaomi's higher resolution sensor might capture more detail in some cases, but the Oppo might do better in low-light thanks to its aperture and sensor.
Front Selfie Camera16MP (f/2.45)50MP (f/2.0)Oppo excels here, offering a high resolution selfie camera with a wide aperture, for clearer and brighter selfies, and video calls.
Telephoto LensNone50MP (f/2.0)The Oppo offers much better versatility with its dedicated telephoto lens, for better portrait photography and zoom capabilities.
Wide Angle LensNone8MP (f/2.2)Oppo's wide angle lens allows users to capture wider scenes, such as landscapes and group photos.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps4K@30fps with HDR, OIS, EIS, up to 1080p@480fpsOppo has better video features, including OIS, EIS, and HDR for better quality videos.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have a good capacity for all-day usage.
Charging67W Fast Charging80W Fast ChargingThe Oppo will charge slightly faster, minimizing downtime.
Other
OSAndroid 11Android 14Oppo comes with a much newer version of Android.
Storage128/256GB256/512GBOppo offers larger internal storage options. Neither phone has expandable storage.
RAM8GB12/16GBOppo offers more RAM for smoother multitasking.
Audio FeaturesDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 micsBasic Audio FeaturesXiaomi offers more enhanced audio features.
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass VictusCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Both phones have similar screen protection technology.
Additional SensorsCompass, Ultrasonic Proximity SensorProximity, Gravity, Geomagnetic SensorsEach phone has different sensors, for better proximity detection.

2. Key Insights

Xiaomi Poco X3 GT:

  • Strengths:
    • Slightly better raw performance in benchmarks thanks to the Mediatek Dimensity 1100.
    • Enhanced audio experience with Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers.
    • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
  • Competitive Advantages:
    • Offers more advanced audio quality and features.
    • Has slightly better raw performance benchmarks.
  • Trade-offs:
    • Uses an IPS LCD screen, which is inferior to AMOLED in terms of color vibrancy and black levels.
    • Heavier and bulkier than the Oppo.
    • Lacks telephoto and wide-angle camera lenses.
    • Older Android version.

Oppo Reno12 Pro:

  • Strengths:
    • Superior AMOLED display with vibrant colors, deeper blacks and higher brightness, which improves viewing experience and visibility in sunlight.
    • Lighter, slimmer design for better ergonomics.
    • More versatile camera system with telephoto and wide-angle lenses.
    • Superior selfie camera quality with higher resolution and wider aperture.
    • Faster charging speed with 80W.
    • Newer OS.
  • Competitive Advantages:
    • Offers better display quality, a more versatile camera system, and a more refined design.
    • Faster charging speed and a newer OS.
  • Trade-offs:
    • Lower performance in benchmarks compared to the Poco.
    • Lacks enhanced audio features like Dolby Atmos.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X3 GT:

  • Best Suited For:
    • Users who prioritize raw performance and audio experience for gaming and multimedia consumption on a budget.
    • Those who don’t mind a slightly bulkier phone with an IPS LCD screen.
  • Use Cases:
    • Mobile gamers looking for performance in games and video and immersive audio.
    • Users who frequently listen to music on their phone and want a quality audio experience.

Oppo Reno12 Pro:

  • Best Suited For:
    • Users who value display quality, camera versatility, and design.
    • Those who prefer a slim and light phone with a more modern OS.
  • Use Cases:
    • Social media enthusiasts who take lots of photos and videos for Instagram, TikTok etc.
    • Those who prefer a light, premium-feeling device with great visual quality.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide between these two phones:

  1. How important is display quality to you?
    • If a vibrant, high-contrast screen is a priority, the Oppo's AMOLED display is the clear winner.
  2. Do you need advanced camera features?
    • If you frequently use telephoto or wide-angle lenses, the Oppo is the better option.
  3. How much do you value a smooth gaming experience vs. more refined design?
    • If smooth gaming is a priority, the Xiaomi could be a better fit; but if a more refined design and screen quality are important then choose the Oppo.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For Mobile Gamers: If you are a gamer and are on a budget, the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT is a better value choice, offering good performance at a lower price point.
  • For Photography Enthusiasts: The Oppo Reno12 Pro with its versatile camera system, optical image stabilization and quality selfie camera is a better option.
  • For Everyday Users: If you want a balance of display quality, design, and camera versatility, the Oppo Reno12 Pro is ideal.
  • For Audio Enthusiasts: The Xiaomi Poco X3 GT is preferable for its enhanced audio features such as Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers.

Which Would I Choose and Why?

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally go with the Oppo Reno12 Pro. Here's why:

  • Superior Display: As a heavy media consumer and someone who values display quality, the AMOLED screen on the Oppo is a significant upgrade. The vibrancy and deep blacks make a huge difference in the viewing experience, especially outdoors.
  • Versatile Camera System: While the raw sensor resolution on the Xiaomi might seem appealing, the Oppo's inclusion of telephoto and wide-angle lenses provides much greater creative freedom and practical use for photography and video.
  • More Ergonomic Design: The slimmer and lighter build of the Oppo makes it a more comfortable phone to use daily, fitting easily into my pocket and feeling more premium in hand.
  • Newer OS: Having the latest version of Android and the promise of future updates is important for longevity and access to new features.
  • Faster Charging: Having a faster charging speed allows me to spend less time tethered to a power outlet, and more time using the phone.

While I appreciate the slightly better benchmark scores and advanced audio features of the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT, the Oppo Reno12 Pro's superior display, camera versatility, ergonomic design, newer OS and faster charging speed would have me choosing that device. For my daily usage, these advantages outweigh the Xiaomi's performance and audio edge.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.