Xiaomi Poco X3 GT vs Motorola Edge 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Edge 40
Motorola Edge 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date August 19, 2021 May 4, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 110.31 cm³ 86.68 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.92 "/g
Weight 193 g 167 g
Height 163.3 mm 158.4 mm
Width 75.9 mm 72 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cloud White
  • Stargaze Black
  • Wave Blue
  • Eclipse Black
  • Nebula Green
  • Viva Magenta
  • Lunar Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.55 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 102.56 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.33 mAh/cm³ 50.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4400 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G77 MC9

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive deep into the specs of the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT and the Motorola Edge 40. This is going to be a fun one, as we've got two very capable phones duking it out. I'll break down their key differences and what they mean for you. Let's get started!

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 GTMotorola Edge 40Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mmMotorola is smaller and more pocketable
Weight193g167gMotorola feels significantly lighter, better for extended use
Display
Size6.6"6.55"Negligible size difference
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Sharp and detailed on both
TechnologyIPS LCDP-OLEDMotorola has better colors, contrast, and viewing angles
Refresh Rate120Hz144HzMotorola offers smoother scrolling and animations
Brightness0 nits1200 nitsMotorola has superior outdoor visibility under bright sunlight
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 1100Dimensity 8020Both offer excellent performance for everyday tasks; differences not significant in real-world
AnTuTu Score745,283762,526Similar performance levels; both handle demanding apps and games
GPUMali-G77 MC9Mali-G77 MC9Similar graphics performance
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.79, 1/2"50MP, f/1.4, 1/1.55"Motorola has a larger sensor and wider aperture for better low light
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.4532MP, f/2.4Motorola captures sharper selfies
Wide/MacroN/A13MP, f/2.2Motorola offers versatile wide-angle and macro capabilities
VideoUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsMotorola has HDR and EIS in all modes, better video quality overall
Camera FeaturesTriple Camera, Digital StabilizationDual Camera, OIS, PDAF, LAFMotorola offers superior autofocus, stabilization, and better night mode
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh4400mAhXiaomi offers slightly longer battery life
Charging67W68WPractically the same fast charging
FeaturesNon-removableNon-removable, Wireless Charging 15WMotorola has convenient wireless charging
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 13Motorola has a more up-to-date OS and likely longer software support
Connectivity
WiFiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6Both support the latest WiFi standards
Bluetooth5.25.2Motorola has a slightly more robust Bluetooth codec selection
GPSComprehensive suiteComprehensive suiteBoth offer reliable navigation; very similar
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM + eSIMMotorola provides flexibility with an eSIM, while Xiaomi has dual physical SIM support
Storage & Audio
Internal Storage128/256 GB256 GBBoth offer ample storage; identical on the maximum config
RAM8 GB8 GBBoth provide smooth multitasking
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone has expandable storage
Audio QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res AudioDolby AtmosXiaomi offers a more feature rich audio experience due to Hi-Res Audio; 3 vs 2 mics is arguable benefit
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass VictusUnknownXiaomi has enhanced screen protection
Security
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedBasic fingerprint sensorXiaomi offers more advanced fingerprint sensor
Sensors
SensorsComprehensive suite with ultrasonic proximityComprehensive suiteBoth provide similar sensor coverage

2. Key Insights

Motorola Edge 40: The Modern Flagship Killer

  • Superior Display: The P-OLED panel with a 144Hz refresh rate is a clear winner, delivering vibrant colors, smooth motion, and excellent outdoor visibility.
  • Enhanced Camera: With a larger sensor, wider aperture, and OIS, the Motorola Edge 40 excels in low-light photography and provides better video quality with HDR. The inclusion of a wide-angle camera adds versatility.
  • Modern Software & Features: Ships with a more up-to-date Android OS and offers the convenience of wireless charging and an eSIM.
  • Slim and Lightweight Design: The phone is thinner and lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use.

Xiaomi Poco X3 GT: The Powerhouse Budget King

  • Bigger Battery: A larger 5000mAh battery ensures longer battery life, a great advantage for heavy users.
  • High Performance for the Price: The Dimensity 1100 delivers excellent performance, especially for gaming and multitasking.
  • Advanced Audio: Hi-Res Audio support and a stereo speaker setup provide an enhanced audio experience.
  • Solid Build Quality: The inclusion of Gorilla Glass Victus adds a layer of enhanced screen protection

Significant Trade-offs

  • Motorola Edge 40: Sacrifices a bit on battery capacity compared to the Xiaomi, and it has a lower display protection specification.
  • Xiaomi Poco X3 GT: Uses an IPS LCD panel, which doesn’t deliver the same vibrancy and viewing angles as the Motorola's OLED. It also lacks wireless charging, eSIM support, and has an older operating system version.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Motorola Edge 40: Ideal for users who prioritize display quality, camera performance, sleek design, and modern features like wireless charging and an eSIM. Great for content creators, social media enthusiasts, and those who enjoy media consumption on the go.
  • Xiaomi Poco X3 GT: Perfect for gamers, heavy users, and those on a tighter budget who need excellent performance and long battery life. Also, good for audiophiles who appreciate Hi-Res Audio.

Specific Use Cases

  • Motorola Edge 40: Capturing high-quality photos and videos, streaming content, and everyday tasks.
  • Xiaomi Poco X3 GT: Intensive gaming, long days without access to a charger, and enjoying high-fidelity audio.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three key questions to help you decide:

  1. How important is display quality to you? If you prioritize vibrant colors, deep blacks, and great outdoor visibility, the Motorola Edge 40’s P-OLED is the better choice.
  2. How important is long battery life? If you need your phone to last throughout very long days without a recharge, the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT’s larger battery will be more suitable.
  3. How important are modern features like wireless charging and eSIM? If these are must-haves, the Motorola Edge 40 is your pick.

Scenario-Based Recommendations

  • The Power User: You need all-day battery life, a reliable processor, and good audio for entertainment. Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
  • The Camera Enthusiast: You want the best possible camera for photos and videos, especially in low-light conditions. Recommendation: Motorola Edge 40
  • The Style Conscious User: You value a slim, lightweight design and a high-quality display for media consumption. Recommendation: Motorola Edge 40
  • The Value Seeker: You are looking for a great price to performance ratio while still having a very capable device. Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 GT

My Choice and Why

If I were to choose, I’d lean towards the Motorola Edge 40.

Why? As a tech journalist and someone who spends considerable time using my phone for media consumption, photography, and everyday tasks, the Motorola’s OLED display, superior camera with OIS, and more modern features outweigh the Xiaomi's benefits for my particular use case. The brighter screen and the inclusion of wireless charging are particularly appealing to me, it also fits better in hand, being thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi.

While I acknowledge the Xiaomi's strengths in battery life and audio quality, the Motorola's advantages are more aligned with my preferences and needs. The slight difference in performance is not a deal breaker for me, both phones are capable enough. Ultimately, for me, the Motorola Edge 40 offers a more compelling all-around experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.