Xiaomi Poco M6 4G vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 13, 2024 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 106.77 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 205 g 189 g
Height 168.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.3 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Purple
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.79 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 550 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.10 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.11 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5030 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco M6 4G vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Holistic Technological Analysis

By: Michael Chen, Technology Researcher

This analysis goes beyond a simple specification comparison, providing a research-driven perspective on the Xiaomi Poco M6 4G and ZTE Blade A75 4G within the broader mobile technology landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureXiaomi Poco M6 4GZTE Blade A75 4GTechnological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Launch DateJune 13, 2024July 1, 2024Indicates market timing and potential adoption rates.LowLowN/AN/A
Price RangeLowLowTargets budget-conscious consumers; influences feature set and component choices.LowHighN/AHigh
Display6.79" IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1080x2460, 550 nits (HBM)6.6" IPS LCD, 90Hz, 720x1612Screen size, refresh rate, resolution, and brightness impact visual experience and power consumption. Higher resolution and brightness in Poco M6 suggest a premium visual experience despite the low price range.MediumMediumHighHigh
ChipsetMediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Processing power significantly affects performance. Helio G91 generally offers better performance than the T606.LowMediumHighHigh
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Core configuration and clock speed determine processing capabilities. Poco M6's higher clock speed indicates superior multi-tasking and demanding application performance.LowMediumHighHigh
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 MP1Graphics processing unit crucial for gaming and visually intensive tasks. Mali-G52 MC2 generally provides a smoother graphical experience compared to the Mali-G57 MP1.LowMediumMediumMedium
RAM/Storage256GB/8GB256GB/4GBMemory and storage capacity impact multitasking and data handling. Poco M6 offers significantly more RAM, crucial for smooth performance with multiple applications and heavier tasks.MediumHighHighHigh
OSAndroid 14Android 13Operating system dictates user interface, features, and security updates. Android 14 on Poco M6 offers the latest features and potentially longer software support.MediumHighMediumHigh
Battery5030 mAh5000 mAhBattery capacity influences usage time. Marginal difference here, but larger display on Poco M6 might lead to comparable real-world battery life.LowMediumComparableMedium
Dimensions (mm)168.6 x 76.3 x 8.3164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Physical dimensions affect handling and portability.LowLowComparableMedium

2. Strategic Technological Insights

Both devices cater to the budget-conscious market, but the Xiaomi Poco M6 demonstrates a strategic focus on performance with its superior chipset, higher RAM, and larger, higher-resolution display. The ZTE Blade A75 prioritizes affordability, potentially compromising on certain performance aspects. The prevalence of 90Hz displays in the budget segment signals a trend towards smoother user experiences becoming increasingly accessible.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

Both devices integrate well with the Android ecosystem. However, the Poco M6, with its more powerful hardware and newer OS, offers better potential for long-term compatibility with demanding applications and future software updates. This aligns with a user base seeking value and longevity. The ZTE Blade A75 targets users prioritizing basic functionality and affordability above cutting-edge performance.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

While both phones offer current-generation features like NFC and USB Type-C, the Poco M6's superior processing power and RAM provide a stronger foundation for future-proofing. This positions it favorably for users seeking a device that remains relevant for a longer period. The choice between the two hinges on individual user priorities: performance and longevity (Poco M6) versus strict budget adherence (ZTE Blade A75). The increasing prevalence of large displays and high refresh rates even in the budget segment indicates a sustained trend towards immersive mobile experiences becoming the norm.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.