Xiaomi Poco M6 4G vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 13, 2024 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 106.77 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 205 g 188.4 g
Height 168.6 mm 171.3 mm
Width 76.3 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Purple
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.79 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 21:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 550 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.10 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.11 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5030 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco M6 4G vs. Motorola Razr 50: A Tale of Two Experiences

As a technology communications specialist, my goal isn't just to compare specs, but to paint a picture of how these devices fit into your life. The Poco M6 4G and Razr 50 represent distinct design philosophies, catering to different needs and priorities. Let's unpack their unique stories.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeaturePoco M6 4GMotorola Razr 50User Experience Impact
Design PhilosophyPractical DurabilityModern Foldable ChicPoco M6 prioritizes robust functionality; Razr 50 emphasizes innovation and portability.
Interface DesignStandard Android with MIUIStandard Android with Motorola customizationsBoth offer familiar Android experiences, but potential UI nuances may impact user preference.
Interaction FlowTraditional Smartphone NavigationFoldable-Specific Interactions, Dual DisplaysRazr 50 introduces unique interaction possibilities due to its folding mechanism and external display.
AccessibilityStandard Android Accessibility FeaturesFoldable-Specific Accessibility ConsiderationsBoth leverage Android accessibility, but Razr 50's design may present unique challenges and opportunities.
Design ErgonomicsLarge, Single-Hand Usable (with effort)Compact when Folded, Larger When UnfoldedRazr 50 offers pocketability at the cost of single-hand usability when unfolded. Poco M6 is consistently large.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

The Everyday Companion: Imagine the Poco M6 4G as your reliable workhorse. Its large 6.79" IPS LCD screen, while not as vibrant as the Razr's AMOLED, provides ample space for multitasking and media consumption. The robust 5030mAh battery ensures you power through your day without constantly searching for an outlet. It's a device built for practicality and endurance.

The Pocket Transformer: The Razr 50 is a statement piece. Picture yourself effortlessly flipping it open to reveal a vibrant 6.9" foldable AMOLED display. Its compact size when folded makes it incredibly pocketable, perfect for those who value on-the-go convenience. The high refresh rate of 120Hz offers a buttery smooth scrolling experience, making interactions feel incredibly fluid. The unique form factor sparks conversation and reflects a forward-thinking lifestyle. However, its smaller battery capacity might require more frequent charging.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

For the Pragmatist: The Poco M6 4G caters to users who prioritize functionality and value. Its large screen benefits users who consume a lot of media or require larger text for accessibility. The long battery life ensures uninterrupted usage.

For the Trendsetter: The Razr 50 appeals to users who embrace cutting-edge technology and appreciate innovative design. Its compact folded size is ideal for users constantly on the move, while the stunning display offers an immersive experience. However, users with larger hands might find the unfolded device less ergonomic for extended use.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing between these devices depends on your personal priorities:

  • Prioritize Practicality and Value: The Poco M6 4G offers a robust, reliable experience at an affordable price point.
  • Embrace Innovation and Style: The Razr 50 provides a unique, futuristic experience with its foldable design and premium features.

Beyond the specifications, consider how each device aligns with your lifestyle and technological preferences. The choice is not just about features, but about the experience you want to embrace.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.