Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 16, 2022 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.71 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.58 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 198 g
Height 159.9 mm 164.2 mm
Width 73.9 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.5 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.93 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.24 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Screens: Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro vs. ZTE Blade V60 Design

Let's embark on a journey to explore two distinct mobile experiences: the vibrant Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro and the pragmatic ZTE Blade V60 Design. Our focus won't just be on cold, hard specs, but on how these devices translate into real-world use for you.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureXiaomi Poco M4 ProZTE Blade V60 DesignUser Experience Impact
Display TypeAMOLED, 90HzIPS LCD, 90HzPoco M4 Pro offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better outdoor visibility.
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels (409 ppi)720 x 1612 pixels (267 ppi)Sharper visuals and text on the Poco M4 Pro; noticeable difference in clarity.
Weight & Dimensions179.5g, 8.1mm thick198g, 8.6mm thickPoco M4 Pro feels lighter and sleeker in hand, contributing to a more comfortable one-handed usage.
Build MaterialGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backUnspecified, likely plasticWhile materials impact durability and premium feel, daily use experience depends more on overall design.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedSide-mountedSimilar accessibility and speed for both devices.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine you're streaming your favorite show outdoors. The Poco M4 Pro's AMOLED screen, with its punchy colors and high brightness, brings the scene to life even under sunlight. While the Blade V60 Design's 90Hz refresh rate ensures smooth scrolling, the LCD panel might struggle with visibility in bright conditions.

Design Choice Impact: The Poco M4 Pro prioritizes a vibrant visual experience, ideal for media consumption. The Blade V60 Design focuses on affordability, potentially compromising on display quality.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

User 1: The Avid Gamer: The Poco M4 Pro's superior display and slightly more powerful processor offer a smoother gaming experience.

User 2: The Budget-Conscious Consumer: The ZTE Blade V60 Design's lower price point makes it accessible without sacrificing core functionalities like a large screen and decent battery life.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing the Right Device:

  • Prioritize Visual Experience: Poco M4 Pro
  • Prioritize Affordability: ZTE Blade V60 Design

My Choice: The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro

While both devices cater to different needs, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro. The superior AMOLED display significantly enhances the overall user experience, particularly for media consumption and gaming, which are important aspects of my personal mobile usage. The lighter weight and slimmer profile also contribute to a more comfortable and enjoyable handling experience. Though it comes at a slightly higher price, the noticeable difference in screen quality and design makes the Poco M4 Pro a more compelling option for me. It represents a better balance of performance, features, and design, ultimately leading to a more satisfying and engaging user experience. The ZTE Blade V60 Design offers excellent value, but for a slightly higher investment, the Poco M4 Pro delivers a significant jump in quality of experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.