Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 16, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.71 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.58 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 222 g
Height 159.9 mm 162.3 mm
Width 73.9 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.5 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.93 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.24 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy M35: A User-Centered Perspective

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just as lists of specs, but as tools that fit into your life. Let's explore the Poco M4 Pro and Galaxy M35 through a user-centered lens.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi Poco M4 ProSamsung Galaxy M35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 13 (Android 11)One UI 5.0 (Android 14)Samsung offers a more modern OS with likely longer software support, leading to a fresher, more secure experience over time.
Display6.43" AMOLED, 90Hz6.6" Super AMOLED, 120HzThe M35's larger, smoother display delivers a more immersive and responsive visual experience.
Interaction FlowMIUI can feel bloated with pre-installed appsOne UI generally offers a cleaner experience.While subjective, many find Samsung's interface more intuitive and less cluttered, contributing to a smoother daily interaction.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android 11 accessibilityEnhanced Android 14 accessibility featuresThe M35 likely benefits from newer Android accessibility advancements, making it potentially more inclusive for users with diverse needs.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (179.5g)Heavier (222g)The Poco M4 Pro offers a lighter, potentially more comfortable in-hand feel for extended use.
Battery5000 mAh6000 mAhThe significantly larger battery in the M35 translates to potentially longer usage time, reducing anxiety about needing a charger.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional who relies on their phone for communication, productivity, and entertainment during a long commute.

  • Poco M4 Pro: The 90Hz AMOLED screen provides a fluid experience for scrolling through emails and social media. However, the battery life might be a concern towards the end of a long day.
  • Galaxy M35: The larger 6000 mAh battery provides peace of mind, allowing for extended use without worrying about power. The 120Hz Super AMOLED display makes everything from browsing to gaming feel incredibly smooth and responsive. The newer Android version also ensures access to the latest features and security updates.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones offer standard accessibility features. However, the M35, running Android 14, likely provides more advanced options, catering to a wider range of user needs. For a user who relies on specific accessibility features, the M35 might be a better choice.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

While the Poco M4 Pro offers a lighter weight and a compelling price point, the Samsung Galaxy M35 emerges as the more compelling choice from a design and user experience perspective.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

The Galaxy M35, with its superior display, larger battery, more recent operating system with longer software support, and potentially enhanced accessibility features, offers a more well-rounded and future-proof user experience. The slightly heavier weight is a minor trade-off for the significant benefits it provides in terms of performance, longevity, and overall user satisfaction. The combination of these factors paints a picture of a device designed for a more seamless and enduring user experience, making it the clear winner for me.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.