Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A14 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 16, 2022 January 12, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 95.71 cm³ 119.03 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.58 "/g 3.27 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 202 g
Height 159.9 mm 167.7 mm
Width 73.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Light Green
  • Dark Red

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.5 % 80.2 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.93 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.24 mAh/cm³ 42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146B
CPU Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146B
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146B

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

The Poco M4 Pro and Galaxy A14 5G: A Tale of Two Experiences

Let's embark on a journey beyond the spec sheet, exploring the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G as complete user experiences. We'll uncover how design choices translate into real-world interactions for diverse users.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeaturePoco M4 ProGalaxy A14 5GUser Experience Impact
Display TypeAMOLED, 90HzPLS LCD, 90HzPoco M4 Pro offers vibrant colors and deeper blacks, potentially enhancing media consumption and visual appeal.
Interface DesignMIUI 13 (Android 11)One UI Core 5 (Android 13)A14 5G benefits from newer Android features and potentially longer software support.
Interaction FlowPotentially more customizable, but can be complexGenerally intuitive and user-friendlyUser tech proficiency may influence preference. Poco's customization might appeal to tech-savvy users.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsStandard Android accessibility options with One UI enhancementsBoth offer basic accessibility, but One UI may provide a more refined experience.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (179.5g)Heavier (202g), thickerPoco M4 Pro might be more comfortable for extended use.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedSide-mountedSimilar accessibility and security features.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for both online classes and entertainment. The Poco M4 Pro's vibrant AMOLED display brings lectures to life, while its lighter weight makes it comfortable to hold during long study sessions. However, the A14 5G's updated Android OS ensures access to the latest features and security updates, crucial for online learning platforms.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a senior citizen: The A14 5G's simpler One UI might be easier to navigate, while the Poco M4 Pro's brighter display could compensate for age-related vision changes.
  • For a budget-conscious user: Both phones offer compelling features at a mid-range price point, but the final decision hinges on individual priorities - display quality versus software updates.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these devices involves understanding personal priorities. If vibrant visuals and a lightweight design are paramount, the Poco M4 Pro shines. If software longevity and a clean interface are preferred, the A14 5G takes the lead.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G. While the Poco M4 Pro's AMOLED display is tempting, I prioritize the long-term usability offered by the A14 5G's newer Android version and the cleaner, more intuitive One UI interface. The slightly heavier weight is a trade-off I'm willing to make for the extended software support and user-friendly experience, which aligns better with my focus on accessibility and inclusive design. Furthermore, the consistent design language of One UI ensures a more predictable and therefore accessible experience for a broader range of users.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.