Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro vs Nokia G60 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G60
Nokia G60
Nokia

General

Launch Date March 16, 2022 September 1, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 95.71 cm³ 108.35 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.58 "/g 3.46 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 190 g
Height 159.9 mm 166 mm
Width 73.9 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Pure Black
  • Ice Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.58 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.5 % 82.8 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 401 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits 400 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.93 mAh/in² 103.93 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.24 mAh/cm³ 41.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro vs. Nokia G60: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the raw numbers. Let's explore the Poco M4 Pro and Nokia G60 through the lens of user experience, crafting a narrative that highlights their unique strengths and weaknesses.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeaturePoco M4 ProNokia G60User Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 13 (Android 11)Android 12 (Near Stock Android Experience)MIUI offers customization, but can feel overwhelming. Stock Android offers a cleaner, smoother feel.
Interaction Flow90Hz AMOLED Display - Smooth, vibrant120Hz IPS LCD - Smoother, less vibrantNokia G60 boasts smoother scrolling and animations, but Poco M4 Pro offers richer color and deeper blacks.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android Accessibility featuresStandard Android Accessibility featuresBoth offer basic features but lack standout inclusive design elements.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (179.5g), slimmer (8.1mm)Heavier (190g), thicker (8.6mm)Poco M4 Pro provides a more comfortable one-handed experience.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a photography enthusiast who also enjoys mobile gaming.

  • Poco M4 Pro: The vibrant AMOLED display brings your photos to life with rich colors and deep blacks. The 90Hz refresh rate ensures a smooth gaming experience, although not as fluid as the Nokia G60.
  • Nokia G60: The 120Hz refresh rate delivers incredibly smooth gameplay, minimizing motion blur. However, the IPS LCD might not showcase your photos with the same visual punch as the Poco M4 Pro's AMOLED screen. The longer software update commitment from Nokia adds peace of mind and potentially a longer lifespan for the device.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to a broad audience with standard Android accessibility features. However, there's room for improvement in inclusive design. For example, neither phone offers advanced features for users with visual or motor impairments.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

  • Prioritize Visual Experience: Choose the Poco M4 Pro for its vibrant AMOLED display and slim design.
  • Prioritize Smooth Performance and Software Updates: Choose the Nokia G60 for its higher refresh rate display, cleaner software and longer software update commitment.

My Choice: The Nokia G60

While the Poco M4 Pro's AMOLED screen is tempting, I prioritize long-term usability and a clean software experience. The Nokia G60's 120Hz refresh rate ensures smoother interactions, and the commitment to three years of OS updates and security patches provides peace of mind knowing my device will remain up-to-date and secure for longer. This aligns with my user-centered approach, valuing longevity and a consistently smooth experience over purely visual aesthetics. The slightly thicker and heavier build is a minor trade-off for the benefits of the G60. In the long run, the G60 promises a more sustainable and user-friendly experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.