Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro vs Nokia C31 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C31
Nokia C31
Nokia

General

Launch Date March 16, 2022 September 1, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 95.71 cm³ 113.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.58 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 200 g
Height 159.9 mm 169.2 mm
Width 73.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Mint
  • Charcoal
  • Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.75 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.5 % 83.4 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.93 mAh/in² 110.84 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.24 mAh/cm³ 44.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5050 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG microUSB 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Smartphones: Poco M4 Pro vs. Nokia C31

Let's embark on a journey to explore two distinct mobile experiences: the vibrant Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro and the steadfast Nokia C31. Rather than getting lost in a sea of specifications, we'll navigate these devices through the lens of user experience, weaving a narrative that highlights their unique personalities.

1. Design and Usability: A Comparative Matrix

FeaturePoco M4 ProNokia C31User Experience Impact
Interface DesignAMOLED, 90Hz refresh rate, vibrant colorsIPS LCD, standard refresh ratePoco offers a smoother, more visually engaging experience. Nokia prioritizes basic functionality.
Interaction FlowResponsive, feature-richSimpler, less demandingPoco caters to power users, Nokia to those seeking ease of use.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsStandard Android optionsBoth offer basic accessibility, but customization might be limited.
Design ErgonomicsSleek, lightweight (179.5g)Larger, heavier (200g)Poco is more portable, Nokia offers a larger screen for content consumption but reduced portability.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for both studying and entertainment.

  • Poco M4 Pro: The student enjoys the vivid AMOLED display for immersive video lectures and vibrant gaming sessions. The 90Hz refresh rate makes scrolling through notes and web pages incredibly smooth. The faster processor handles multitasking with ease, switching between apps seamlessly.
  • Nokia C31: The student appreciates the large screen for reading ebooks and articles. The long-lasting battery ensures they can take notes and attend online classes without worrying about power. While not as visually stunning or fast as the Poco, the Nokia provides a reliable platform for essential tasks.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

  • Tech-Savvy User: The Poco M4 Pro's performance and feature set would appeal to a user who enjoys exploring the latest technology and demands a smooth, responsive experience.
  • First-Time Smartphone User: The Nokia C31's simplicity and durability might be more appealing to someone new to smartphones or prioritizing ease of use and affordability.
  • User with Visual Impairment: Both devices rely on standard Android accessibility features. Further customization might be needed for optimal usability.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing the right device depends on your priorities:

  • Prioritize Visual Experience and Performance: Poco M4 Pro
  • Prioritize Simplicity, Durability, and Battery Life: Nokia C31

My Choice: The Poco M4 Pro

While I appreciate the Nokia C31's straightforward approach, I would choose the Poco M4 Pro. Its AMOLED display, coupled with the 90Hz refresh rate, creates a significantly more engaging user experience. The superior processing power ensures a smooth and responsive interaction, crucial for both productivity and entertainment. The sleek design and lighter weight enhance portability without compromising on screen size. Although the Nokia C31 boasts a slightly larger battery, the Poco M4 Pro's 5000mAh battery is more than sufficient for a full day's use. The added features like NFC and a more robust connectivity suite further solidify the Poco M4 Pro as the more versatile and compelling device for my needs. Ultimately, I believe the Poco M4 Pro delivers a more well-rounded and enjoyable user experience, striking a balance between performance, aesthetics, and practicality.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.