Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 11, 2021 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 109.13 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 195 g 189 g
Height 163.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.8 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.82 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

The Poco M4 Pro 5G vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's move beyond the gigabytes and gigahertz and dive into what truly matters: the user experience. We'll explore the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G and the ZTE Blade A75 4G as companions in your daily life, not just collections of specs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeaturePoco M4 Pro 5GZTE Blade A75 4GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 12.5 (Android 11) - Highly CustomizableStock Android 13 - Clean and SimplePoco offers more personalization, ZTE provides a potentially smoother, less bloated experience.
Interaction Flow90Hz Refresh Rate - Smooth Scrolling90Hz Refresh Rate - Smooth ScrollingBoth phones offer fluid navigation and responsiveness, a noticeable upgrade for everyday use.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android Accessibility + MIUI FeaturesStandard Android 13 Accessibility FeaturesBoth offer basic accessibility, but MIUI may provide more granular control for specific needs.
Design Ergonomics195g - Slightly Heavier, 8.8mm Thick189g - Lighter, 8.6mm ThinZTE might feel more comfortable for extended use due to its lighter weight and slimmer profile.
Display Quality1080 x 2400 pixels (399 ppi) - Sharper Display720 x 1612 pixels (267 ppi) - Less SharpPoco's display delivers significantly crisper visuals for media consumption and overall clarity.
PerformanceDimensity 810 - More PowerfulUnisoc T606 - Less PowerfulPoco offers smoother multitasking and better performance for demanding applications and gaming.
Connectivity5G Enabled4G OnlyPoco provides future-proof connectivity and faster data speeds in areas with 5G infrastructure.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine you're a photography enthusiast. The Poco M4 Pro 5G, with its superior 50MP camera and sharper display, allows you to capture vibrant, detailed photos and relive those moments with stunning clarity. The ZTE Blade A75 4G's 50MP camera, while boasting a high megapixel count, lacks the detailed sensor information of the Poco, potentially resulting in less impressive real-world results. Sharing those photos on the go? Poco's 5G connectivity ensures quick uploads and downloads, even in crowded areas.

Now, picture yourself as a student on a budget. The ZTE Blade A75 4G offers ample storage (256GB) for your assignments and media, and its long-lasting 5000mAh battery ensures you stay connected throughout the day. While the Poco M4 Pro 5G also boasts a 5000mAh battery, its higher price point might be a barrier for budget-conscious users.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For a tech-savvy user who values performance and future-proofing, the Poco M4 Pro 5G's powerful processor and 5G connectivity are compelling. However, for a senior citizen who prioritizes simplicity and affordability, the ZTE Blade A75 4G's clean Android interface and lower price tag might be more appealing.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Both phones cater to different user needs. The Poco M4 Pro 5G is a performance-oriented device with a focus on visual clarity and speed, ideal for users who engage in demanding tasks. The ZTE Blade A75 4G prioritizes affordability and simplicity, making it a good choice for budget-conscious users or those seeking a straightforward smartphone experience.

My Choice: The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers an attractive price and ample storage, I prioritize the overall user experience offered by the Poco M4 Pro 5G. The sharper display, superior performance, and future-proof 5G connectivity are significant advantages that enhance daily usage. The slightly higher price is justified by the noticeable improvements in key areas like visuals, speed, and connectivity, creating a more engaging and satisfying user experience in the long run. I also appreciate the higher resolution screen as someone who consumes a lot of media on their phone.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.