Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs vivo X100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date November 11, 2021 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 109.13 cm³ 104.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.36 "/g
Weight 195 g 202 g
Height 163.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.8 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.82 mAh/cm³ 47.67 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs. vivo X100: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive beyond the spec sheet and explore the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G and the vivo X100 as experiences, not just devices. We'll uncover how their design choices translate into real-world usability for you.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5Gvivo X100User Experience Impact
Interface DesignAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12), MIUIAndroid 14, OriginOS (likely)The vivo X100, with its newer Android version and potentially updated custom UI, promises a more modern, feature-rich, and potentially smoother interface experience.
Interaction Flow90Hz IPS LCD120Hz LTPO AMOLEDThe vivo's higher refresh rate AMOLED display will feel significantly more responsive and fluid, especially in scrolling and animations. The superior contrast and vibrant colors of AMOLED contribute to a more visually engaging experience.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility options, side-mounted fingerprint sensorStandard Android accessibility options, under-display fingerprint sensorBoth offer standard accessibility features. The under-display fingerprint sensor on the vivo X100 contributes to a cleaner aesthetic, but personal preference dictates sensor location preference.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic back, 195gLikely glass or metal back, 202gWhile slightly heavier, the vivo X100 likely boasts premium materials, leading to a more refined feel in hand.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're browsing your favorite social media feed. On the Poco M4 Pro 5G, the 90Hz refresh rate provides a smooth experience, but the LCD's limitations in color vibrancy and contrast might make images and videos appear less engaging. Switch to the vivo X100, and the 120Hz LTPO AMOLED screen brings the feed to life. The colors pop, blacks are deep, and the scrolling feels incredibly smooth, almost like butter. The difference is palpable.

Scenario: You're trying to capture a fleeting moment – a child's laughter, a bird taking flight. The Poco M4 Pro 5G's camera offers decent capabilities, but the vivo X100's advanced camera system with optical image stabilization (OIS) and Zeiss lens technology empowers you to capture sharper, more detailed images and videos, preserving those memories with stunning clarity. The X100's superior low-light performance further expands your creative possibilities.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both devices cater to a broad audience, offering standard Android features and solid connectivity. However, the vivo X100's superior display and performance make it a more compelling choice for users who consume a lot of media or engage in graphically demanding tasks. The Poco M4 Pro 5G, with its lower price point, targets budget-conscious users who prioritize essential features over premium aesthetics and performance.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G is a functional device prioritizing affordability. It delivers essential features without unnecessary frills.

The vivo X100, on the other hand, represents a more premium experience. It prioritizes a refined design, a stunning display, and advanced camera capabilities, catering to users who demand a higher level of performance and visual fidelity.

My Choice: The vivo X100

While the Poco M4 Pro 5G offers excellent value, I would choose the vivo X100. Its superior display, faster processor, more advanced camera system, and newer Android version create a significantly more compelling and future-proof user experience. The fluid 120Hz LTPO AMOLED screen alone promises a transformative difference in daily interaction, making every swipe and scroll a delight. For me, the investment in the X100 translates to a tangible improvement in how I engage with my device, making it a more enjoyable and productive tool. The premium design and advanced camera capabilities are the icing on the cake, further solidifying the X100 as the clear winner in this comparison.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.