Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark Go 2023 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 11, 2021 January 24, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 109.13 cm³ 110.13 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g N/A
Weight 195 g 0 g
Height 163.6 mm 163.9 mm
Width 75.8 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Nebula Purple
  • Endless Black
  • Uyuni Blue
  • Skin Orange

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 85 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.82 mAh/cm³ 45.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G and the Tecno Spark Go 2023, focusing on the user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GTecno Spark Go 2023User Experience Impact
Interface DesignModern, minimalist with MIUI customizationsStock Android 12, potentially simplerPoco offers more customization, Spark Go provides a cleaner, potentially more intuitive experience
Interaction FlowSmooth, 90Hz refresh rate enhances fluidityStandard 60Hz (assumed), less responsivePoco offers a noticeably smoother experience for scrolling and animations
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility features + MIUI optionsStandard Android accessibility featuresBoth offer basic accessibility, Poco might provide additional customization
ErgonomicsLightweight (195g), slim (8.8mm)Slightly thicker (8.9mm), weight unknownPoco likely feels more premium and comfortable to hold

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for online classes, social media, and casual gaming.

  • Poco M4 Pro 5G: The student enjoys the smooth scrolling through lecture notes, the vibrant display for watching videos, and the responsive performance for quick app switching. The 90Hz refresh rate makes even simple tasks feel more fluid and engaging. The faster processor handles multitasking with ease.
  • Spark Go 2023: The student finds the phone adequate for attending online classes, but experiences occasional lag when switching between apps. The lower resolution display is less immersive for video content. Gaming performance is limited.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Tech-Savvy User: Might prefer the Poco M4 Pro 5G for its performance and customization options.
  • Budget-Conscious User: The Spark Go 2023 is more affordable but compromises on performance and display quality.
  • Senior User: Both phones offer large screens for readability. The Spark Go 2023's simpler interface might be easier to learn. However, the lack of weight information makes it difficult to assess its suitability for users with dexterity issues.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

  • Prioritize Performance and Visuals: Poco M4 Pro 5G
  • Prioritize Affordability and Simplicity: Tecno Spark Go 2023

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would recommend the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G.

Why? While the Tecno Spark Go 2023 offers a lower price point, the Poco M4 Pro 5G provides a significantly better user experience. The 90Hz display, faster processor, and overall design contribute to a more fluid, engaging, and enjoyable interaction. In the long run, the enhanced usability and performance of the Poco M4 Pro 5G outweigh the initial cost savings of the Spark Go 2023. The smoother experience reduces user frustration, contributing to a more positive and productive relationship with the technology. This aligns with my mission to prioritize user-centered design and advocate for intuitive and engaging technology. The lack of weight information for the Spark Go is also a concern, as device weight significantly impacts usability.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.