Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 11, 2021 March 24, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 109.13 cm³ 96.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 195 g 189 g
Height 163.6 mm 159.6 mm
Width 75.8 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 85.4 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.82 mAh/cm³ 51.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 12 16

Comparison Summary

The Poco M4 Pro 5G and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Tale of Two Mid-Range Titans

Let's embark on a journey to explore the nuanced landscapes of the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G. Rather than getting bogged down in a spec sheet showdown, we'll weave a narrative that highlights how these devices translate technical prowess into tangible user experiences.

1. Design and Usability: A Visual Symphony

FeaturePoco M4 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A53 5GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 12.5 (Android 11) - known for customization options, sometimes perceived as clutteredOne UI 4.1 (Android 12) - clean, minimalist aesthetic with intuitive navigationSamsung offers a potentially more streamlined and user-friendly interface, especially for users new to Android. Poco's MIUI offers deeper customization but might feel overwhelming to some.
Interaction Flow90Hz IPS LCD – Smooth, but potentially less vibrant than AMOLED120Hz Super AMOLED – Fluid, vibrant visuals with deeper blacks and richer colorsThe A53 5G's higher refresh rate and AMOLED display create a more visually immersive and responsive experience, from scrolling through social media to playing games.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsOne UI's comprehensive suite includes advanced features like one-handed mode and customizable font sizes.Samsung generally provides a wider range of built-in accessibility options, catering to a broader spectrum of user needs.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic back, relatively thicker (8.8mm)Plastic back, slimmer profile (8.1mm)While both have plastic backs, the A53 5G's slimmer profile might feel more comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration: Painting Pictures with Technology

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah. The Poco M4 Pro 5G offers her a 50MP main camera, promising detailed shots. However, the lack of optical image stabilization might lead to blurry images in low light or when capturing action. The Galaxy A53 5G, with its 64MP optically stabilized camera, empowers Sarah to capture crisp, steady photos even in challenging conditions. It's like having a built-in tripod, always ready to assist.

Scenario: Consider David, a mobile gamer. The A53 5G's 120Hz AMOLED display immerses him in vibrant worlds, with smooth animations that enhance gameplay. While the Poco M4 Pro 5G's 90Hz refresh rate is no slouch, the A53 5G offers a more responsive and visually engaging gaming experience. It's like upgrading from standard definition to high definition in the world of mobile gaming.

3. Inclusive Technology: A Symphony for Everyone

Both devices offer a good foundation for accessibility, with standard Android features. However, Samsung's One UI takes it a step further with its comprehensive suite of accessibility options. This commitment to inclusivity ensures a more comfortable and personalized experience for users with diverse needs.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework: Guiding the Choice

Beyond the numbers, the choice between these devices boils down to design philosophy and user priorities. Do you value vibrant visuals and a buttery-smooth interface? The A53 5G beckons. Do you prioritize extensive customization options and a potentially lower price point? The Poco M4 Pro 5G might be your muse.

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

While the Poco M4 Pro 5G offers compelling value, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G. Its superior display (120Hz AMOLED), optically stabilized camera, longer software support commitment (up to Android 16), and more refined design philosophy align with my user-centered approach. The smoother, more vibrant visuals, combined with the promise of extended software updates and a cleaner user interface, create a more compelling overall package for me. It represents a more future-proof investment, offering a consistently enjoyable and engaging user experience for years to come.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.