Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 11, 2021 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 109.13 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 195 g 209 g
Height 163.6 mm 161.7 mm
Width 75.8 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.82 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12 18

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Mid-Rangers: Poco M4 Pro 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A35

Let's embark on a journey to explore two compelling contenders in the mid-range smartphone arena: the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A35. Rather than getting bogged down in a spec sheet showdown, we'll weave a narrative that highlights how these devices translate technical capabilities into real-world user experiences.

1. Design and Usability: A Comparative Matrix

FeaturePoco M4 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 12.5 (Android 11)One UI 5.0 (Android 14)A35 boasts a more modern, refined interface with potentially longer software support.
Interaction Flow90Hz IPS LCD120Hz Super AMOLEDA35 offers smoother scrolling and animations with vibrant AMOLED visuals, enhancing overall responsiveness.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsOne UI's comprehensive suite of accessibility featuresA35 likely provides a more inclusive experience for users with diverse needs.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic back, side-mounted fingerprint sensorPlastic back, under-display fingerprint sensorA35's under-display fingerprint sensor contributes to a cleaner aesthetic and modern feel.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration: Bringing Features to Life

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah, who loves capturing vibrant cityscapes. The Poco M4 Pro 5G, with its 50MP main camera, allows Sarah to capture detailed shots, but the lack of optical image stabilization might result in blurry images in low light or when she's on the move. The Galaxy A35, boasting optical stabilization and a more advanced camera system including a dedicated macro lens, empowers Sarah to capture sharper, steadier photos and explore intricate details, even in challenging conditions.

Another Scenario: Consider David, a college student who relies heavily on his phone for multitasking and entertainment. The A35's faster processor, coupled with the smoother 120Hz AMOLED display, allows for seamless app switching and an immersive video-watching experience. While the Poco M4 Pro 5G offers capable performance, the A35 provides a noticeable boost in speed and fluidity for demanding tasks.

3. Inclusive Technology: Diverse Perspectives

Both phones offer large displays suitable for users with visual impairments. However, the A35's AMOLED screen provides higher contrast, making text and images easier to discern. Samsung's One UI generally offers more robust customization options for font sizes and display settings, further enhancing accessibility.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework: Guiding Your Choice

Beyond the numbers, the choice between these devices boils down to the overall experience you seek. The Poco M4 Pro 5G offers solid value and performance, while the Samsung Galaxy A35 prioritizes a more refined, premium user experience with its superior display, updated software, and enhanced camera capabilities.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35.

Why? My focus on user-centered design and holistic experience leads me to favor the A35. The smoother 120Hz AMOLED display, the more powerful processor, the updated OS with longer software support promise, and the advanced camera features with optical image stabilization create a more engaging and satisfying user experience. While the Poco M4 Pro 5G offers good value, the A35's design choices resonate more strongly with my emphasis on intuitive interaction and long-term usability. The under-display fingerprint sensor adds a touch of modern elegance, and the overall feel of the device aligns with a more premium user experience that I value. Ultimately, the A35 provides a more compelling narrative of technological capability seamlessly integrated with a user-focused design philosophy.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.