Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A25 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 11, 2021 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 109.13 cm³ 102.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 195 g 197 g
Height 163.6 mm 161 mm
Width 75.8 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.82 mAh/cm³ 48.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12 18

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A25: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just as lists of specs, but as tools that fit into your life. Let's delve into a narrative-driven comparison of the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A25, focusing on the user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeaturePoco M4 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A25User Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 12.5 (Android 11) - Highly CustomizableOne UI 5 (Android 14) - Clean, Feature-RichSamsung offers a more modern, refined interface with potentially longer software support. Poco offers greater personalization options.
Interaction Flow90Hz Refresh Rate - Smooth, but not as fluid120Hz Refresh Rate - Noticeably SmootherGalaxy A25 provides a more premium feel with its higher refresh rate, resulting in a more responsive and enjoyable user experience.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android Accessibility OptionsOne UI Enhanced Accessibility SuiteSamsung generally provides a broader range of accessibility features for users with diverse needs.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic Back - Lightweight, but less premium feelPlastic Back- Lightweight, but less premium feelBoth phones offer similar ergonomics, though material choices may influence perceived quality.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're scrolling through your social media feed. On the Poco M4 Pro 5G, the 90Hz display offers a smooth experience, but switching between apps might show slight lag. On the Galaxy A25, the 120Hz display makes every scroll and transition feel incredibly fluid, like silk gliding through your fingers. This seemingly small difference significantly impacts how responsive and enjoyable the phone feels in everyday use.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For a user who prioritizes the latest software and a refined user experience with longer-term updates, the Samsung Galaxy A25, running Android 14, is a clear winner. However, for someone who values extensive customization and a vibrant, playful aesthetic, the Poco M4 Pro might be more appealing. Tech-savvy users might find Poco's open approach to customization enticing, while less experienced users may appreciate the polished simplicity of Samsung's One UI.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond raw specs, consider your personal interaction style. Do you crave the absolute smoothest scrolling and a clean interface? The A25 excels in this area. Do you enjoy tweaking every aspect of your phone's look and feel? The Poco M4 Pro offers that freedom.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A25

While I appreciate the customization options of the Poco M4 Pro 5G, I prioritize the long-term software support, the noticeably smoother 120Hz display, and the more refined user experience offered by the Samsung Galaxy A25. The more modern Android version and Samsung's commitment to updates ensure a device that remains relevant and secure for longer. Furthermore, the subtle yet significant difference in display fluidity elevates everyday interactions, making the A25 feel more responsive and enjoyable to use. In my view, these factors contribute to a more future-proof and satisfying user experience in the long run.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.