Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs Realme GT Neo 3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 11, 2021 March 30, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 109.13 cm³ 101.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.56 "/g
Weight 195 g 188 g
Height 163.6 mm 163.3 mm
Width 75.8 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Plain Black (Asphalt Black)
  • Silverstone White (Sprint White)
  • Le Mans Blue (Nitro Blue)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.82 mAh/cm³ 49.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G610 MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 12 13

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs. Realme GT Neo 3: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's embark on a journey beyond the spec sheet, exploring the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G and Realme GT Neo 3 as holistic user experiences. We'll uncover how design choices translate into real-world usability, empowering you to choose the device that truly resonates with your needs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeaturePoco M4 Pro 5GRealme GT Neo 3User Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 12.5 (Android 11)Realme UI 3.0 (Android 12)Realme offers a potentially more modern and feature-rich software experience.
Interaction Flow90Hz IPS LCD120Hz AMOLEDGT Neo 3 boasts smoother animations and more vibrant visuals.
AccessibilityStandard Android AccessibilityStandard Android AccessibilityComparable accessibility features.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic back, side-mounted fingerprintGlass back, under-display fingerprintGT Neo 3 feels more premium and offers a potentially more seamless unlock.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: A Day in the Life

Imagine you're a budding photographer capturing the vibrant energy of a street festival. The Poco M4 Pro 5G's 90Hz display provides a smooth preview of your shots, while its reliable battery life ensures you don't miss a moment. However, the Realme GT Neo 3's superior AMOLED display with HDR10+ brings your photos to life with breathtaking color accuracy and dynamic range. Its faster 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling through your gallery a delight. Furthermore, the GT Neo 3's significantly faster charging speed (80W vs 33W) minimizes downtime, getting you back into the action quicker.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

For the Budget-Conscious User: The Poco M4 Pro 5G offers excellent value with its capable processor and long battery life.

For the Performance Seeker: The Realme GT Neo 3's Dimensity 8100 chipset and faster refresh rate deliver a premium performance experience for demanding tasks and gaming.

For the Visual Enthusiast: The GT Neo 3's AMOLED display with HDR10+ provides a visual feast, ideal for multimedia consumption and content creation.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Prioritize Value: Poco M4 Pro 5G

Prioritize Performance and Visuals: Realme GT Neo 3

My Choice: Realme GT Neo 3

While the Poco M4 Pro 5G offers commendable value, the Realme GT Neo 3 resonates more with my design-centric approach. Its superior AMOLED display, faster performance, incredibly fast charging, and more refined design create a more compelling overall user experience. The smoother interactions, vibrant colors, and premium feel contribute to a more engaging and enjoyable technological journey. It represents a more significant leap in user experience, making it the clear winner for me. Although price is a consideration, the long-term benefits of a superior display and performance outweigh the initial cost difference in my personal evaluation.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.