Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs Realme C61 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C61
Realme C61
Realme

General

Launch Date November 11, 2021 July 25, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 109.13 cm³ 100.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 195 g 188 g
Height 163.6 mm 167.3 mm
Width 75.8 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Dark Green
  • Sparkle Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 560 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.82 mAh/cm³ 49.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G and the Realme C61, moving beyond the raw numbers to uncover the stories these devices tell about the user experience.

Design and Usability Assessment:

FeaturePoco M4 Pro 5GRealme C61User Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 12.5 (Android 11) - Highly CustomizableRealme UI Go Edition (Android 14)Poco offers more personalization, Realme a cleaner, potentially more intuitive interface due to stock Android's nature.
Interaction Flow90Hz Refresh Rate - Smooth scrolling & animations90Hz Refresh Rate - Smooth scrolling & animationsBoth offer fluid navigation. However, software optimization will ultimately determine real-world smoothness, which can vary.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android Accessibility SuiteStandard Android Accessibility SuiteBoth rely on Android's built-in features. User experience will depend on individual needs and how well each brand integrates these features into their UI.
Design Ergonomics195g, 8.8mm thick188g, 7.8 mm thickRealme C61 is slightly lighter and thinner, potentially offering a more comfortable one-handed experience.

Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for online classes, social media, and casual gaming.

  • Poco M4 Pro 5G: The student appreciates the vibrant display and the fast processor for multitasking between apps. The customizable interface allows them to personalize their phone to reflect their style. However, the MIUI can feel overwhelming with its numerous features and occasional bloatware.
  • Realme C61: The student enjoys the clean and simple interface of the Realme UI Go Edition. The lightweight design makes it comfortable to hold during long study sessions. However, they might notice occasional performance hiccups when playing demanding games or switching between multiple apps.

Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Tech-Savvy User: Might prefer the Poco M4 Pro 5G for its powerful processor, 5G connectivity, and extensive customization options.
  • Casual User: Might find the Realme C61 more appealing due to its simple interface, lightweight design, and ease of use.
  • Budget-Conscious User: Both devices offer excellent value, but the Realme C61 generally comes at a lower price point.

Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these devices depends on individual priorities:

  • Prioritize Performance and Customization: Poco M4 Pro 5G
  • Prioritize Simplicity, Lightweight Design, and Affordability: Realme C61

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G

While the Realme C61 offers an attractive lightweight design and clean interface, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G. The deciding factors for me are the superior processor (Dimensity 810 vs. Unisoc Tiger T612), 5G connectivity for future-proofing, NFC for contactless payments, and the higher resolution display (1080 x 2400 vs 720 x 1600). While MIUI has its quirks, I appreciate the level of customization it offers. The slightly heavier weight and thicker build are minor trade-offs for the significant performance and connectivity advantages. In the long run, the Poco M4 Pro 5G provides a more robust and versatile user experience that aligns with my needs for productivity, entertainment, and future technology adoption.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.