Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 11, 2021 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 109.13 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 195 g 189 g
Height 163.6 mm 171.4 mm
Width 75.8 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.82 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12 17

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: A Tale of Two Experiences

Let's embark on a journey beyond mere specs and delve into the distinct worlds these two devices offer. We'll uncover how design choices translate into real-world user experiences, empowering you to choose the device that truly resonates with your needs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GMotorola Razr 50 UltraUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignStandard Android skin, potentially with MIUI customizations.Stock Android with likely Motorola enhancements.MIUI can be feature-rich but also overwhelming for some. Stock Android offers a cleaner, potentially more intuitive experience.
Interaction FlowTraditional smartphone navigation with gestures and buttons.Foldable design introduces new interaction paradigms with external and internal displays, impacting app continuity and multitasking.The Razr 50 Ultra offers a unique, flexible workflow, but may require a learning curve. The Poco M4 Pro 5G provides a familiar smartphone experience.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility options.Likely includes standard Android options, potentially enhanced for foldable usage.Both should offer basic accessibility, but the Razr's unique form factor might present specific accessibility considerations.
Design ErgonomicsClassic slab design, potentially bulky due to battery size.Slim and compact when folded, but thicker when unfolded. Folding mechanism introduces a potential point of fragility.The Poco M4 Pro 5G prioritizes battery life and affordability, potentially at the cost of sleekness. The Razr 50 Ultra emphasizes portability and a futuristic aesthetic, with potential trade-offs in durability and battery life.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional constantly on the move.

  • Poco M4 Pro 5G: Our professional relies on the Poco's long-lasting 5000mAh battery to power through the day, effortlessly handling emails, calls, and basic tasks. The 90Hz display provides smooth scrolling for web browsing and social media. This is a reliable workhorse.

  • Razr 50 Ultra: Our professional quickly checks notifications and responds to messages on the Razr's external display, minimizing distractions during meetings. When needed, they unfold the device for immersive presentations and detailed data analysis. The foldable design becomes a statement of innovation and adaptability.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Tech-Savvy User: Both devices offer appealing features. The tech-savvy user might appreciate the Razr 50 Ultra's cutting-edge technology and unique form factor, embracing the learning curve associated with a foldable device.

  • Casual User: The Poco M4 Pro 5G's familiarity and affordability might be more appealing to a casual user who prioritizes simplicity and value. The foldable design of the Razr could be perceived as overly complex or fragile.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choose the Poco M4 Pro 5G if:

  • You prioritize battery life and affordability.
  • You prefer a familiar, reliable smartphone experience.
  • You value a robust, durable device.

Choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra if:

  • You value portability and a compact design.
  • You embrace innovation and cutting-edge technology.
  • You desire a device that makes a statement.
  • You need a flexible device for multitasking and varying content consumption needs.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

While the Poco M4 Pro 5G offers excellent value, I would choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra. Its innovative foldable design, coupled with the powerful Snapdragon processor and stunning external display, truly captivates me. I embrace the potential learning curve and the trade-offs in battery life for the unique user experience and portability it provides. The Razr 50 Ultra represents a bold step forward in mobile technology, and I am excited to experience its transformative potential firsthand. It aligns with my appreciation for cutting-edge design and the seamless integration of technology into a dynamic lifestyle.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.