Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs Motorola Razr 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date November 11, 2021 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 109.13 cm³ 93.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 195 g 188.6 g
Height 163.6 mm 170.8 mm
Width 75.8 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.82 mAh/cm³ 44.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12 16

Comparison Summary

The Foldable Future vs. the Workhorse: Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs. Motorola Razr 40

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G and the Motorola Razr 40, moving beyond the raw numbers to understand how these devices fit into different lifestyles.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GMotorola Razr 40User Experience Impact
Form FactorTraditional Slab DesignFoldable SmartphoneThe Razr 40's compact folded size offers significant portability advantages, while the Poco M4 Pro provides a familiar, larger screen experience.
Display6.6" IPS LCD, 90Hz6.9" Foldable pOLED, 144Hz, HDR10+The Razr 40 boasts a superior display with vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling. The folding mechanism introduces a unique interaction.
Interface DesignMIUI 12.5 (Android 11)My UX (Android 13)While both offer Android experiences, potential differences in customization and bloatware could impact user preferences.
Interaction FlowStandard touch-based interactionTouch-based with folding/unfolding gestures, external displayThe Razr 40 introduces new interaction possibilities with its folding design and quick view external display for notifications and specific tasks.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android Accessibility SuiteStandard Android Accessibility Suite + potential folding specific featuresBoth devices offer basic accessibility features. The Razr 40's unique form factor may necessitate specific accessibility considerations.
Design ErgonomicsLarger, potentially less one-hand friendlyCompact when folded, potentially more comfortable for some usersUser preference will dictate the ergonomic winner. Larger hands may prefer the Poco, while smaller hands might find the folded Razr 40 more suitable.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario 1: The Commuter: Imagine a busy professional navigating public transport. The Razr 40, effortlessly compact when folded, slips into a pocket with ease. A quick glance at the external display reveals incoming notifications without unfolding. The Poco M4 Pro, while offering a larger screen for media consumption during the commute, might feel bulkier in a pocket.

Scenario 2: The Content Creator: A budding photographer needs a device for capturing and editing on the go. The Razr 40's foldable design enables unique angles and "Flex View" for hands-free recording. The Poco M4 Pro, while capable, relies on traditional smartphone ergonomics. Its larger battery, however, might offer longer shooting sessions.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

User Group 1: Tech-Savvy Early Adopters: This group will likely be drawn to the Razr 40's innovative folding design and higher-end display.

User Group 2: Budget-Conscious Practical Users: The Poco M4 Pro's affordability and larger battery capacity will resonate with this group.

User Group 3: Users with Accessibility Needs: Both devices offer standard Android accessibility features. However, specific needs related to dexterity and vision should be considered in relation to the folding mechanism of the Razr 40.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing between these devices hinges on prioritizing innovation versus practicality. The Razr 40 represents a leap forward in smartphone design, offering portability and unique interaction paradigms. The Poco M4 Pro, however, delivers solid performance and a familiar user experience at a more accessible price point.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Motorola Razr 40. While the Poco M4 Pro is a reliable workhorse, the Razr 40's foldable design resonates with my appreciation for innovative technology that pushes boundaries. Its compact form factor, coupled with the external display's ability to streamline interactions, aligns perfectly with my vision of a user-centered mobile experience. The superior display quality enhances media consumption, and the unique folding capabilities inspire new possibilities for content creation and daily use. The slight price premium is justified for the significant leap in user experience the Razr 40 offers. It's not just a phone; it's a statement about embracing the future of mobile technology.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.