Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 11, 2021 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 109.13 cm³ 104.99 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.04 "/g
Weight 195 g 227 g
Height 163.6 mm 163 mm
Width 75.8 mm 77.6 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Black Titanium
  • White Titanium
  • Natural Titanium
  • Desert Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1320 x 2868
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 92.2 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 98.40 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.82 mAh/cm³ 44.63 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4685 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Apple A18 Pro (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Hexa-core (2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Apple GPU (6-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 11 18
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Titans: Poco M4 Pro 5G vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max

Let's embark on a journey into the world of mobile experiences, where raw specifications transform into tangible user interactions. Today, we'll compare two seemingly disparate contenders: the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max. Our focus won't solely be on megapixels and gigahertz, but on how design choices translate into real-world usability for you.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeaturePoco M4 Pro 5GiPhone 16 Pro MaxUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12), CustomizableiOS 18, Uniformity and SimplicityAndroid offers flexibility; iOS prioritizes ease of use. Choice depends on user preference for customization vs. streamlined experience.
Interaction Flow90Hz IPS LCD, noticeable but not flagship-level smoothness120Hz LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, buttery smooth, power-efficientiPhone's superior display tech delivers a significantly more fluid and visually engaging experience. Scrolling, gaming, and media consumption are enhanced.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsRobust iOS accessibility suite including VoiceOver, Zoom, Switch ControlBoth offer basic accessibility, but iOS provides a more comprehensive and integrated suite for users with diverse needs.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic build, lightweight (195g)Titanium build, premium feel, heavier (227g)Poco M4 Pro is easier to hold for extended periods; iPhone 16 Pro Max offers a more luxurious feel but can be tiring for some.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine you're a budding photographer. The Poco M4 Pro 5G offers a capable 50MP main camera, allowing you to capture detailed shots. However, the iPhone 16 Pro Max boasts a 48MP main camera with a larger sensor and advanced computational photography powered by the A18 Pro chip. This translates to superior low-light performance and more nuanced image processing, bringing your creative vision to life with greater fidelity. The iPhone's Cinematic Mode allows for professional-grade video recording with shallow depth of field, adding a storytelling element to your films.

Scenario: You're a student juggling multiple apps and assignments. The iPhone's powerful A18 Pro chip effortlessly handles multitasking, ensuring a smooth experience even with demanding applications. While the Poco M4 Pro's Dimensity 810 is competent, it might show signs of strain under heavy workloads.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

User 1: Tech-Savvy Individual: Values customization and tinkering with settings. The Poco M4 Pro 5G's open Android ecosystem provides greater freedom to personalize the device.

User 2: Senior Citizen: Prioritizes simplicity and ease of use. The iPhone 16 Pro Max's intuitive interface and larger display are more accessible.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Beyond technical specifications, the choice boils down to your personal priorities. If you value affordability, customization, and a lightweight design, the Poco M4 Pro 5G is a compelling option. If you prioritize a premium user experience, cutting-edge technology, and a seamless ecosystem, the iPhone 16 Pro Max, despite its higher price tag, delivers a more refined and feature-rich experience.

My Choice: iPhone 16 Pro Max

While I appreciate the Poco M4 Pro 5G's value proposition, I would choose the iPhone 16 Pro Max. The superior display, powerful processor, advanced camera system, and robust ecosystem outweigh the price difference for me. The seamless integration of hardware and software, coupled with the polished user experience iOS offers, aligns more closely with my personal preferences for a device that effortlessly blends into my workflow and enhances my daily life. The iPhone 16 Pro Max represents a holistic approach to design, prioritizing user experience above all else, making it the clear winner in this comparison.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.