Xiaomi Poco M4 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 7, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 111.08 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 200 g 209 g
Height 164 mm 161.7 mm
Width 76.1 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.58 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.6 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 401 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 500 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.48 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.01 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco M4 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive deep into a comparative analysis of the Xiaomi Poco M4 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A35, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer in real-world usage.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco M4 5GSamsung Galaxy A35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 76.1 x 8.9161.7 x 78 x 8.2A35 slightly more compact, potentially easier to handle.
Weight (g)200209Negligible difference in weight.
Display
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzA35 boasts richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to AMOLED and higher refresh rate.
Size (inches)6.586.6Virtually identical screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24081080 x 2340Similar sharpness; imperceptible difference in daily use.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 700Exynos 1380A35 significantly more powerful, enabling smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreA35's CPU architecture is more modern and efficient, resulting in better performance.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G68 MP5A35 offers superior graphics performance for demanding applications and games.
RAM4/6GB6/8GBA35 offers more RAM in its base configuration, enhancing multitasking and responsiveness.
OSAndroid 12Android 14A35 comes with a newer OS, offering potential feature and security advantages.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPComparable resolution, but A35 features OIS for steadier shots and videos.
UltrawideN/A8MPA35 offers ultrawide photography for capturing broader scenes.
Selfie Camera8MP13MPA35 boasts a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA35 capable of recording higher resolution videos.
Battery Life
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities; actual battery life will depend on usage patterns.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A35 is the clear winner in terms of performance, display, and camera capabilities. Its Exynos 1380 chipset, coupled with ample RAM, delivers significantly smoother performance compared to the Poco M4 5G's Dimensity 700. The A35's Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate provides a visually superior experience with vibrant colors and fluid scrolling. While both phones have a 50MP main camera, the A35 benefits from optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper images and videos, along with an ultrawide lens for added versatility.

The Xiaomi Poco M4 5G, however, likely comes at a lower price point. It offers solid fundamentals, including 5G connectivity, a large battery, and a decent display for everyday tasks.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Power User/Gamer: The Galaxy A35 is the better choice due to its superior performance, display, and camera. It handles demanding tasks and games with ease.
  • Budget-Conscious User: The Poco M4 5G is a good option for those seeking essential features like 5G and long battery life without breaking the bank.
  • Casual User: The A35 provides a more premium experience overall, but if budget is a primary concern, the Poco M4 5G is a viable alternative.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Poco M4 5G likely offers better value for money at a lower price point.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For gaming, multimedia consumption, or demanding tasks, the A35 is superior. For basic communication, web browsing, and casual use, the Poco M4 5G suffices.
  3. How important is display quality? The A35's Super AMOLED display provides a noticeable improvement over the Poco M4 5G's IPS LCD.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would opt for the Samsung Galaxy A35. While potentially more expensive, the A35 offers a significant upgrade in performance, display quality, and camera capabilities. The smoother performance thanks to the Exynos 1380, coupled with the vibrant Super AMOLED display and the versatility of its camera system, outweighs the price difference for me. As someone who values a fluid user experience and enjoys mobile photography, the A35 aligns better with my needs and preferences. The inclusion of OIS further solidifies its advantage, ensuring sharper photos and videos even in challenging conditions. I appreciate the future-proofing offered by the newer Android version and the added longevity provided by the more powerful hardware. The slightly larger RAM capacity on the A35 also ensures smoother multitasking, which is crucial for my workflow. While the Poco M4 5G is a respectable contender, particularly for budget-conscious buyers, the A35 delivers a more compelling overall package.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.