Xiaomi Poco M4 5G vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 7, 2022 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 111.08 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 200 g 184.5 g
Height 164 mm 170.8 mm
Width 76.1 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.58 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.6 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 401 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 500 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.48 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.01 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco M4 5G vs. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Xiaomi Poco M4 5G and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, two phones occupying the "medium price" range but offering vastly different experiences. I'll break down the specs, analyze their real-world impact, and help you decide which phone might be your perfect fit.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco M4 5GMotorola Razr 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 76.1 x 8.9170.8 x 74 x 7 (folded)Razr 40 Ultra significantly more compact when folded, pocketable
Weight (g)200184.5Razr 40 Ultra lighter despite the folding mechanism
FoldableNoYesRazr offers a unique form factor, compact when folded
Display
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 165HzRazr boasts superior contrast, vibrant colors, smoother scrolling
Size (inches)6.586.9Razr offers slightly larger screen real estate
Resolution (px)1080 x 24081080 x 2640Comparable sharpness, Razr slightly taller aspect ratio
Brightness (nits)500 (HBM)1400 (peak)Razr significantly brighter, excellent outdoor visibility
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 700Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Razr dramatically more powerful, smoother multitasking, gaming
CPUOcta-core 2.2 GHzOcta-core 3.19 GHzRazr offers significantly faster processing speeds
RAM (GB)4/68/12Razr offers more RAM, better for demanding apps and multitasking
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5012Poco M4 has higher resolution, Razr likely better image quality
Selfie Camera (MP)832Razr offers a much higher resolution selfie camera
Video1080p@30fps4K@60fpsRazr capable of significantly higher resolution video recording
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50003800Poco M4 has a larger battery, potentially longer battery life

2. Key Insights

The Poco M4 5G is a budget-friendly 5G phone focused on providing essential features. Its large battery is a standout, promising extended usage. However, its processor is less powerful, and the display is a standard LCD.

The Razr 40 Ultra is a flagship foldable phone with a cutting-edge design and top-tier specifications. Its foldable screen, powerful processor, vibrant display, and fast refresh rate offer a premium experience. The trade-off is a smaller battery and a significantly higher price. The main camera resolution might seem lower on paper, but sensor quality, processing, and lens often play a bigger role in real-world image quality than megapixel count alone. We'd need to test both cameras extensively to draw definitive conclusions.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Poco M4 5G: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and reliable 5G connectivity. Students, casual users, and those seeking a secondary device would find this phone suitable.

Razr 40 Ultra: Perfect for tech enthusiasts, early adopters, and those who value a premium, cutting-edge device. The foldable design and powerful specs cater to users who demand top performance and a unique form factor. Those who value portability and a device that makes a statement would gravitate toward the Razr.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What's your budget? The Razr 40 Ultra commands a significantly higher price.
  • What's your priority? Long battery life and affordability (Poco M4 5G) or cutting-edge technology and a unique design (Razr 40 Ultra)?
  • What's your typical usage? Casual browsing and communication (Poco M4 5G) or demanding tasks, multitasking, and media consumption (Razr 40 Ultra)?

My Choice: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

While the Poco M4 5G offers excellent value, I would choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. The foldable form factor genuinely excites me. The blend of portability and a large screen when unfolded is compelling. I appreciate the power of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, ensuring a smooth and responsive experience for everything from gaming to content creation. While the battery is smaller than the Poco M4 5G, the trade-off for the overall performance and innovative design is worthwhile for me. The higher refresh rate display is also a major draw, promising a more fluid and enjoyable user experience. I am willing to pay a premium for a device that pushes the boundaries of mobile technology and offers a glimpse into the future of smartphones.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.