Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 27, 2020 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2020 2024

Physical

Volume 120.44 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 198 g 222 g
Height 162.3 mm 162.3 mm
Width 77.3 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 9.6 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.4 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 140.71 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.82 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureXiaomi Poco M3Samsung Galaxy M35Practical Impact
Dimensions162.3 x 77.3 x 9.6 mm162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1 mmSimilar height, Galaxy M35 is slightly wider (1.3mm), Poco M3 is slightly thicker (0.5mm). Minimal real-world difference in pocketability or single-handed use.
Weight198g222gPoco M3 is lighter (24g), noticeable difference, may be more comfortable for extended holding.

Display

FeatureXiaomi Poco M3Samsung Galaxy M35Practical Impact
Size6.53"6.6"Negligible size difference, both feel similar in hand.
Resolution1080x23401080x2340Same sharpness, both provide crisp images and text.
Pixel Density395 PPI390 PPIPractically identical, no visible difference in clarity.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDGalaxy M35 has superior contrast, deeper blacks, more vibrant colors and better power efficiency, especially with dark themes. Better for media consumption.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzGalaxy M35 provides smoother scrolling, animations and more responsive gaming experience. A very noticeable difference.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsPeak brightness is missing and we are unable to comment on screen legibility in bright sunlight conditions.

Performance

FeatureXiaomi Poco M3Samsung Galaxy M35Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)Galaxy M35's processor is significantly faster and more power-efficient, offering snappier performance, smoother multitasking and improved gaming performance.
Antutu Score185,028578,500Galaxy M35 has drastically better performance, apps load much faster, better for resource-intensive tasks and gaming. The difference is very large.
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G68 MP5Galaxy M35 has a more capable GPU, leading to better graphics in games.

Camera

FeatureXiaomi Poco M3Samsung Galaxy M35Practical Impact
Rear Standard Lens48MP, f/1.79, 1/2", 0.80µm, Samsung S5KGM150MP, f/1.8, 1/2", 1.00µm, Sony LYT-600Galaxy M35 has slightly higher resolution and bigger pixels for better low light performance, but aperture is slightly smaller. The larger pixels should capture more light.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.0, 1/4", 1.12µm, Omnivision OV885613MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm, sensor model not specifiedGalaxy M35 has higher resolution, potentially more detail in selfies, but aperture is slightly smaller.
Wide Angle LensN/A8MP, f/2.2, sensor model not specifiedGalaxy M35 offers wider perspective for group shots and landscapes. Missing on the Poco M3.
Macro LensN/A2MP, f/2.4, sensor model not specifiedGalaxy M35 can take close-up photos of very small objects. Missing on the Poco M3.
Video Recording1080p@30fps, no EIS, 120fps slow-motion4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@60fps with EIS, 720p@480fps with EIS, 480 fps slow motionGalaxy M35 has significantly better video capabilities, more resolutions and framerates, better stabilisation resulting in much smoother footage.
Camera FeaturesDigital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Autofocus, Touch focus, Manual focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer2x2 OCL, Pro Video Mode, 4K Video, Digital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Ultra stable video, AutoFraming, Autofocus, Touch focus, All Pixel Omni- Directional PDAF, NPU AI Engine, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, Night Mode, RAW 12 bits, DOL HDRGalaxy M35 offers more advanced features, including 4K video, OIS, Pro video mode, Night mode. Providing better control and quality in varied conditions.

Battery

FeatureXiaomi Poco M3Samsung Galaxy M35Practical Impact
Capacity6000mAh6000mAhSimilar battery life, both phones offer good battery life.
Charging18W Fast Charging, Li-Polymer25W Fast Charging, Li-IonGalaxy M35 charges faster, reducing downtime.
FeaturesReverse Charging, 22.5W charger in boxNon-removablePoco M3 can charge other devices. Galaxy M35's charging may be faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco M3 Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for prolonged use.
  • Reverse Charging: Can act as a power bank for other devices.
  • Included Charger: Comes with a 22.5W charger in the box, unlike the Samsung.

Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED screen with 120Hz refresh rate offers much better viewing experience.
  • Significantly Faster Performance: More powerful chipset for smoother app usage and gaming.
  • Better Cameras: Higher resolution sensors, additional lenses, significantly improved video capabilities with OIS, better low light, and a host of advanced features.
  • Faster Charging: 25W charging reduces charge times.
  • Newer Software: Ships with a more recent version of Android.
  • More Storage: Higher storage options.
  • Better Audio: Dolby Atmos provides an enhanced audio experience, better quality and immersion.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • The Galaxy M35 is heavier than the Poco M3, and some users may prefer the lighter phone.
  • Poco M3 does not support expandable storage.
  • Poco M3 comes with Android 10 which is an outdated OS.
  • The screen on the Poco M3 is not as vibrant as the AMOLED screen on the M35.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco M3 Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users seeking maximum battery life and a lighter phone, who are not too demanding in terms of performance or features.
  • Users who prioritize battery life above all else and do not require a high performing phone.
  • Those who use their phone primarily for basic communication, social media and occasional browsing.

Use Cases:

  • Long days away from power outlets, as a secondary phone or for users who value battery life over performance.
  • Basic daily tasks and general use.

Samsung Galaxy M35 Ideal User:

  • Users who value display quality, performance and better camera capabilities.
  • Users who want a more modern experience with better software and features, with a more premium user experience.
  • Users who enjoy mobile gaming, social media content creation, photography, and video editing.

Use Cases:

  • Mobile gaming, watching videos, taking photos and videos, and other demanding tasks.
  • Users who want a smoother and snappier experience in day to day usage.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is my primary use case? (Basic communication vs. gaming/media consumption)
  2. What is my budget? (Price to value)
  3. How important is performance and screen quality to me? (Responsiveness and viewing experience)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget-Focused User: If your priority is a very basic, lightweight phone for simple tasks, and battery life, and you're on an extremely tight budget, the Xiaomi Poco M3 could be considered (if you can accept its limitations).

  • Scenario 2: Balanced User: If you desire a well-rounded device with much better performance, a premium display, superior camera, and faster charging, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is a much better choice. The higher price is justified by the significantly better features and more modern experience.

  • Scenario 3: Gaming/Media Enthusiast: The Samsung Galaxy M35 is the better option thanks to its superior display, performance, camera, and other features. It will provide a much better gaming and video consumption experience.

My Choice

Given the information, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35.

Reasons:

While the Xiaomi Poco M3 has a lighter design and reverse charging, the Galaxy M35 offers a significantly superior user experience in almost every other aspect. The AMOLED screen with its 120Hz refresh rate is a massive upgrade over the Poco M3's IPS LCD. The performance difference, as shown by the Antutu scores, is substantial. The Galaxy M35's camera system, with its additional lenses, better video capabilities, and advanced features, offers much more versatility and quality.

The faster charging, newer software, and additional storage options also make the Galaxy M35 a much more modern and practical device. For most users, the benefits of the Galaxy M35 in terms of daily usage will far outweigh the minor advantages of the Poco M3. The superior performance and features justify the price difference, making the Galaxy M35 the more future proof and well rounded option. It provides a much more enjoyable and versatile user experience for everyday tasks and gaming alike.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.