Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 27, 2020 March 26, 2021
Release Year 2020 2021

Physical

Volume 120.44 cm³ 100.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 198 g 189 g
Height 162.3 mm 159.9 mm
Width 77.3 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 9.6 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.4 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 407 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 140.71 mAh/in² 106.51 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.82 mAh/cm³ 44.61 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 618

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco M3Samsung Galaxy A52Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions162.3 × 77.3 × 9.6 mm159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mmPoco M3 is noticeably larger and thicker; A52 feels more compact in hand and pocket
Weight198g189gA52 is slightly lighter, which may be more comfortable for extended use
Display
Size6.53"6.5"Negligible size difference; Both provide a similar screen real estate
Resolution1080x23401080x2400Similar sharpness; Not a significant difference in visual clarity
PPI395407Very similar pixel density; Both offer a sharp display experience
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDA52 has superior display with deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors, better for media consumption
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzA52 provides smoother scrolling and animations, resulting in a more fluid user experience
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have identical peak brightness at 0 nits; Insufficient data to compare
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)A52 has a more powerful and efficient chipset; Offers faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance
AnTuTu Score185,028341,212A52 has significantly higher performance; noticeably faster general usage and gaming capabilities
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 618A52 has a more powerful GPU, providing better graphics performance for gaming and other graphics-intensive tasks
Battery
Capacity6000mAh4500mAhPoco M3 has a much larger battery, likely resulting in significantly longer battery life; good for heavy users and those without regular charging access
Charging18W fast charging25W fast chargingA52 charges faster, reducing the wait time for a full charge
FeaturesReverse charging, 22.5W fast charger in-boxQC2.0 and AFCPoco M3 can charge other devices; A52 supports Quick Charge 2.0 and Adaptive Fast Charging protocols
Camera
Standard Camera48MP, f/1.79, 1/2", 0.8µm64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", 0.8µmA52 has a higher resolution sensor with larger sensor size, which results in better detail and low light performance
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.0, 1/4", 1.12µm32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", 0.8µmA52 has a significantly higher resolution front-facing camera, resulting in better selfie quality
Wide Angle LensNone12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µmA52 has a wide-angle lens for capturing more of a scene
Portrait ModeNone5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µmA52 has a dedicated depth sensor for more accurate portrait shots
Macro LensNone5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µmA52 has a dedicated macro lens for taking close-up shots
Video1080p@30fps, No EIS4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@60fps with EISA52 supports 4K video recording with Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS), offering higher quality and stability; Poco M3 lacks EIS
FeaturesTriple camera, digital image stabilization, etc.Quadruple camera, Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), etc.A52 has OIS for better video stability and sharper low light photos, plus additional camera features such as Night Mode
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 11 (upgradable to Android 14)A52 offers a newer operating system with better security and features, plus a longer update support
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n/ac802.11a/b/g/n/acBoth have similar Wi-Fi connectivity options
Bluetooth5.0 LE5.0 LE, EDR, HID, ANT+A52 has more Bluetooth features, but the difference is likely minor for most users
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NavICGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoPoco M3 supports NavIC for potentially better navigation accuracy in certain regions
SIMDual SIM (Nano)Dual SIM (Nano)Both offer dual-SIM capabilities
Storage
Internal64 GB/128 GB128 GB/256 GBA52 offers double the max storage capacity; Suitable for users with many apps, photos, and videos.
RAM4 GB / 6GB4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GBA52 provides an 8GB RAM option; Better for heavy multitasking, gaming, and future-proofing the device.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows memory expansion
Audio
QualityHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo SpeakersA52 has a slight edge in audio features (Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus) for better sound; Poco M3 has Hi-Res audio support
Security
Featuresside-mounted fingerprint sensorbasic fingerprint sensorPoco M3 has a more convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor; Both provide basic biometric security
Build Quality
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Corning Gorilla Glass 5A52 has improved screen protection against scratches and drops
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint, Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtualBiometric: Fingerprint, Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, GyroscopePoco M3 additionally features Compass and Ultrasonic proximity sensor. A52 additionally features Proximity, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic. Both have similar sensors suitable for advanced features and gaming

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco M3 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: The 6000mAh battery offers significantly longer battery life, ideal for users who need a phone that can last multiple days without charging or during long travel.
  • Reverse Charging: Can charge other devices using its battery.
  • Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More ergonomic and convenient than the traditional fingerprint sensor of the A52
  • Lower price: Generally sold for a cheaper price than the A52

Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: The AMOLED display offers superior visual quality with deeper blacks, vibrant colors, and better contrast, enhancing media consumption and overall visual experience.
  • Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate provides a more fluid and responsive user experience, particularly noticeable while scrolling and gaming.
  • Better Performance: The Snapdragon 720G chipset and higher AnTuTu score translate to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance.
  • Superior Camera System: The 64MP main camera with a larger sensor, additional wide-angle, portrait, and macro lenses, plus OIS and 4K video recording, provide significantly better imaging capabilities.
  • More RAM and storage: A52 offers more ram and storage options.
  • Longer Software Support: A52 comes with a newer version of Android and will receive up to Android 14, ensuring a more secure and updated user experience.
  • Faster Charging: The 25W fast charging capabilities will replenish the battery faster.
  • Enhanced Audio: Dolby Atmos & Digital Plus offer enhanced spatial audio.
  • Better Build Quality: Gorilla Glass 5 offers better scratch and drop resistance for the screen.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Poco M3: While offering a significantly larger battery, it compromises on display quality, processing power, and camera performance compared to the A52. It also comes with an older operating system.
  • Galaxy A52: Although providing a better all-around experience, the A52 has a smaller battery, which may require more frequent charging than the Poco M3 for heavy users. It also costs more.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco M3 is ideal for:

  • Budget-conscious users: Those who prioritize affordability and long battery life over high-end features and camera quality.
  • Heavy users: Individuals who require a phone that can last through multiple days on a single charge without needing a power bank.
  • Basic users: People who use their phone mainly for calls, texts, social media browsing and need a long-lasting battery.
  • Travelers: Those who often travel and don't have regular access to charging points.

Use Cases for Poco M3:

  • Extended use without charging (multi-day use)
  • Streaming audio and consuming media for a long time.
  • Using as a secondary phone or backup device.
  • Basic daily tasks like calls, texts and social media.

Samsung Galaxy A52 is ideal for:

  • Multimedia Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize a high-quality display for watching videos, playing games, and consuming media.
  • Photography Lovers: Those who need a capable camera system with versatility for various shooting conditions.
  • Gamers: Users who want smoother gameplay and better graphics performance.
  • Power Users: Individuals who frequently multitask and use resource-intensive apps.
  • Users who need an updated OS: People who need a newer operating system for security and latest features.

Use Cases for Galaxy A52:

  • Capturing high-quality photos and videos in various scenarios.
  • Playing graphically demanding games smoothly.
  • Watching movies and videos on a vibrant, high-contrast display.
  • Multitasking across various apps seamlessly.
  • Daily use with a preference for better overall experience than the Poco M3.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Battery Life vs. Performance: Do you prioritize extremely long battery life, or do you prefer a smoother user experience with better performance?
  2. Camera Quality vs. Budget: Is a high quality camera system essential or are basic camera capabilities adequate for your usage?
  3. Display Quality vs. Cost: Is a superior AMOLED display with higher refresh rate worth the extra cost or is a standard IPS LCD panel adequate for your daily usage?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Basic Usage, Long Battery Life, Budget: If your primary needs are long battery life and basic functionality, the Xiaomi Poco M3 is the better choice, given its larger battery and lower price.
  • Scenario 2: Multimedia Consumption and Gaming: If you frequently watch videos, play games, or need a better camera system, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is the recommended option due to its superior display, performance, and camera capabilities.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced Experience: If you want a balance between battery life and overall performance with good camera and display features, and the budget allows, the Samsung Galaxy A52 offers a better user experience with its more balanced features.

Conclusion:

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52.

While the Xiaomi Poco M3's massive battery is tempting, the Galaxy A52 offers a significantly better overall experience that is worth the trade-off in battery capacity. The superior AMOLED display, smoother performance, more versatile camera system, and longer software support make the A52 a more compelling device for most users. Although the Poco M3 is more affordable, the enhancements in screen quality, processing power, and camera capabilities on the A52 provide a more enjoyable experience for daily use and media consumption, especially given that the battery of the A52 is not bad. For me, the long-term benefits outweigh the initial cost difference between these two devices.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.