Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Nothing Phone (1) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 27, 2020 July 16, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 120.44 cm³ 100.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 198 g 193.5 g
Height 162.3 mm 159.2 mm
Width 77.3 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 9.6 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.55 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.4 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 140.71 mAh/in² 104.89 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.82 mAh/cm³ 44.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco M3Nothing Phone (1)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions162.3 x 77.3 x 9.6 mm159.2 x 75.8 x 8.3 mmPoco M3 is larger and thicker, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use. Nothing Phone (1) is more compact and slimmer.
Weight198g193.5gNegligible difference in weight, both feel similarly weighted in hand.
Build
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Corning Gorilla Glass 5Nothing Phone (1) offers better scratch and shatter resistance.
Display
Size6.53"6.55"Both have virtually identical screen sizes.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2400Both offer sharp visuals; difference is negligible.
Pixel Density395 PPI402 PPIVery similar sharpness, no noticeable difference in daily use.
TechnologyIPS LCDOLEDNothing Phone (1) offers more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast compared to the LCD on the Poco M3.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzNothing Phone (1) provides smoother scrolling, animations, and overall user experience.
Brightness0 nits1200 nitsNothing Phone (1) is significantly better for outdoor visibility, especially in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm)Nothing Phone (1) is significantly faster, leading to smoother multitasking and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score185,028624,253Nothing Phone (1) demonstrates much faster app loading, better overall system responsiveness, and is more future-proof.
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 642LNothing Phone (1) has a more powerful GPU, offering better gaming performance and graphic rendering.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.79, 1/2", 0.8µm50MP, f/1.88, 1/1.56", 1.0µmNothing Phone (1) has a larger sensor and larger pixel size, generally resulting in better low-light performance and better image quality overall.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.0, 1/4", 1.12µm16MP, f/2.2, 1/3.13", 1.0µmNothing Phone (1) captures more detailed selfies due to higher resolution and similar pixel size, though aperture is narrower.
Wide Angle + MacroNone50MP, f/2.2, 1/2.76", 0.64µmNothing Phone (1) has a dedicated wide-angle and macro camera for more versatility in photography.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fpsNothing Phone (1) offers significantly higher quality video recording, with 4K capability and EIS for stabilization.
Camera FeaturesDigital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization4K Video, Digital zoom, Dual camera, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Ultra stable video, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF)Nothing Phone (1) has advanced features like OIS and PDAF, resulting in higher quality photos and videos.
Battery
Capacity6000 mAh4500 mAhPoco M3 has a significantly larger battery for longer usage on a single charge, but actual battery endurance varies.
Charging18W Fast Charging33W Fast ChargingNothing Phone (1) charges faster, although it does not include a charger in the box.
Battery FeaturesReverse charging, 22.5W charger in-boxReverse charging, Wireless Charging 15W, Reverse wireless charging 5W, No charger in-boxNothing Phone (1) offers wireless charging capabilities, a premium feature absent on Poco M3.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 12, upgradeable to 15Nothing Phone (1) runs a newer version of Android, offering more features, security updates, and better overall software experience.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n/ac802.11a/b/g/n/ac/axNothing Phone (1) supports Wi-Fi 6 for faster and more reliable wireless connections.
Bluetooth5.05.2Nothing Phone (1) has a newer Bluetooth version, resulting in improved performance and better codec support.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NavICGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), Galileo (E1+E5a), NavICNothing Phone (1) has a more comprehensive GPS system, offering more accuracy.
Storage
Internal64 GB or 128 GB128 GB or 256 GBNothing Phone (1) has higher base storage options, more space for media, apps, and files.
RAM4 GB or 6 GB8 GB or 12 GBNothing Phone (1) has substantially more RAM, improving multitasking and app performance.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither device supports expandable storage, meaning that the user has to live with what's built in.
Audio
Audio QualityHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersStereo Speakers, 3 MicrophonesBoth offer stereo speakers; Poco M3 has Hi-Res audio, and Nothing Phone (1) has a 3-mic setup.
Security
FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBasic fingerprint sensorSide-mounted sensors are usually faster, more accurate, and easier to use; Nothing Phone (1) uses a more basic sensor.
Sensors
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtualBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, RGBNothing Phone (1) offers a more comprehensive set of sensors for additional features such as gaming.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco M3 Advantages:

  • Significantly larger battery: The 6000mAh battery provides extended usage time, ideal for users who prioritize long battery life.
  • Included charger: Comes with a 22.5W fast charger in the box, saving the cost of buying a separate charger.
  • Hi-Res Audio: Can play higher fidelity audio due to Hi-Res Audio certification.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Generally easier and more intuitive.

Nothing Phone (1) Advantages:

  • Superior Display: OLED panel with 120Hz refresh rate offers significantly better visual experience than Poco M3's IPS LCD.
  • Much Faster Performance: The Snapdragon 778G+ 5G chipset is dramatically faster for apps and gaming, leading to a smoother experience.
  • Better Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, OIS, and a dedicated wide-angle/macro lens offer superior photo and video quality.
  • Faster Charging & Wireless Charging: 33W fast charging and wireless charging capability provides more convenient charging options.
  • Modern Software: Ships with Android 12 and is upgradeable to 15, which offers better functionality and security over the older Android 10.
  • Better Connectivity: Supports newer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards for faster and more reliable connections.
  • More Comprehensive GPS: Offers more precise location tracking due to more support for satellite systems.
  • More RAM and Storage: Larger memory capacity for more apps and better performance.

Trade-offs:

  • Poco M3: Larger battery life comes at the cost of lower performance and an inferior display.
  • Nothing Phone (1): Higher price and lacks a charger in the box, but has superior performance, display, and camera.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco M3:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and are less concerned about high-end performance or display quality.
  • Use Cases:
    • Users needing a phone for basic tasks, browsing, and social media.
    • Individuals who require a long-lasting phone due to limited access to charging.
    • Casual users who don't play demanding games.
  • Price-to-Value: Excellent value for its price, especially for users focused on battery life and core smartphone functions.

Nothing Phone (1):

  • Ideal User: Users who value a premium display, fast performance, better cameras and are willing to pay more for such features.
  • Use Cases:
    • Gamers who need smooth performance.
    • Users who enjoy taking high quality photos and videos.
    • Individuals who watch a lot of media and want a better screen.
    • Users who appreciate fast charging and wireless charging.
  • Price-to-Value: Offers a significant upgrade over the Poco M3 in multiple key aspects.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your primary use case? Is it mainly for basic tasks and media consumption, or for more demanding activities like gaming and photography?
  2. How important is battery life vs. performance and visual quality? Do you prioritize long usage time or fast processing and a high-quality display?
  3. What is your budget and how much are you willing to spend? Are you looking for the best value or willing to invest more for premium features?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight Budget, Long Battery Life: If your primary concern is battery life and you are on a very tight budget, the Xiaomi Poco M3 is the more suitable option despite its less capable processor and inferior display.
  • Scenario 2: Performance and Display Focus: If you want a smoother, faster smartphone with a beautiful display, better camera, and wireless charging, the Nothing Phone (1) is worth the higher investment.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced Usage with Value: If you seek balanced performance with good battery life, the Nothing Phone (1) provides a better all-around experience, albeit at a higher price than the Poco M3.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Nothing Phone (1). The superior display, vastly improved performance, much better camera system, and additional features like wireless charging make it the clear winner for my needs. I am willing to pay a premium for those capabilities, and the modern design of the Nothing Phone (1) is more attractive to me. Although the battery capacity is lower, the faster charging makes up for this and I typically have access to charging when needed. I value having a good quality camera as I take photos often, and the camera of the Nothing Phone (1) is considerably better.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.