Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Motorola Moto G53 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 27, 2020 December 15, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 120.44 cm³ 99.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.55 "/g
Weight 198 g 183 g
Height 162.3 mm 162.7 mm
Width 77.3 mm 74.7 mm
Thickness 9.6 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Ink Blue
  • Arctic Silver
  • Pale Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.4 % 83.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 140.71 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.82 mAh/cm³ 50.17 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Poco M3 vs. Motorola Moto G53

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco M3Motorola Moto G53Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions162.3 × 77.3 × 9.6 mm162.7 × 74.7 × 8.2 mmMoto G53 is slimmer and slightly narrower, making it feel more comfortable in hand; Poco M3 is noticeably thicker and wider.
Weight198g183gMoto G53 is lighter, which can be more comfortable for prolonged use.
BuildCorning Gorilla Glass 3 screen protectionUnknown screen protectionPoco M3 has better screen scratch and damage protection; durability of Moto G53's screen is unknown.
Display
Size6.53"6.5"Negligible difference in screen size, both offer similar viewing area.
Resolution1080x2340720x1600Poco M3 offers a much sharper display; text and images appear clearer. Moto G53's display is less detailed.
PPI395270Poco M3 has a much higher pixel density, resulting in sharper images and text.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use the same LCD technology, providing similar color reproduction and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzMoto G53 provides smoother scrolling and animations; looks more fluid.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsPeak brightness is not specified, may be a concern in bright sunlight; practical brightness may vary.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 662 (11 nm)Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)Moto G53 offers better performance for apps and gaming due to its more efficient and newer chip; Poco M3 may lag in demanding tasks.
AnTuTu Score185,028319,946Moto G53 demonstrates significantly better overall performance for daily usage, gaming and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 619Moto G53's GPU provides better graphics for smoother gaming and better video playback.
Camera
Rear Main48MP, f/1.79, 1/2", 0.8µm50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µmPoco M3 has larger sensor, which may lead to better low-light performance, though Moto G53 has slightly higher megapixel count and slightly narrower aperture; Overall similar quality.
Selfie8MP, f/2.0, 1/4", 1.12µm8MP, f/2.0, size and pixel size unknownSimilar selfie camera specs; quality of the Moto G53 is hard to fully determine without knowing sensor and pixel size.
Macro LensNot Available2MP, f/2.4, sensor size and pixel size unknownMoto G53 offers dedicated macro lens for detailed close-up shots.
Video1080p@30fps, slow-mo 120fps1080p@30fps, slow-mo 120fpsBoth support similar basic video capture.
FeaturesTriple camera, DIS, digital zoom, etc.Dual camera, DIS, digital zoom, etc.Poco M3 has triple camera setup, Moto G53 has advanced autofocus features such as Laser AF, PDAF, and CDAF; Moto G53 also offers Night Mode
Battery
Capacity6000mAh5000mAhPoco M3 offers significantly longer battery life, better for extended usage without charging.
Charging18W fast charging, 22.5W charger in box, reverse charging18W fast charging, 10W charger in boxPoco M3 has a faster charger in-box, and it can also reverse charge other devices; Both have 18W fast charging, but Moto G53 has a much slower charger out of the box

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco M3 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: 6000mAh offers significantly longer battery life compared to the Moto G53.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution (1080x2340) and pixel density (395 PPI) for clearer visuals.
  • Reverse Charging: Can charge other devices, a useful feature.
  • Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 3 provides superior screen durability compared to the unknown protection on Moto G53.
  • In-box Charger: 22.5W fast charger, offering faster initial charging speeds out of the box.

Motorola Moto G53 Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate offers significantly smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Better Performance: Snapdragon 480+ 5G chip performs significantly better than the Snapdragon 662 of the Poco M3, particularly for gaming.
  • Newer Android Version: Ships with Android 13, offering the latest features and security updates.
  • eSIM Support: Offers eSIM, enabling multiple carrier options.
  • Macro Lens: Dedicated macro lens for close-up photography.
  • Better Audio: Dolby Atmos
  • More RAM Options: Has 8 GB variant.

Trade-offs:

  • The Poco M3 sacrifices performance for a larger battery, while the Moto G53 prioritizes performance and smoother visuals but with a smaller battery.
  • The Poco M3 has a higher-resolution display but with a standard 60Hz refresh rate, the Moto G53 is smoother with 120hz but lower resolution.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco M3 is ideal for:

  • Users who prioritize long battery life and can't always charge their device regularly.
  • Those who value a sharp display for reading and media consumption.
  • Users on a strict budget looking for a reliable phone with basic features.
  • Individuals who may occasionally need to reverse-charge other devices.

Use Cases:

  • Extended travel where access to charging is limited.
  • Users who frequently consume media and text content.
  • Light social media and casual browsing.

Motorola Moto G53 is ideal for:

  • Users who prioritize a smooth and fluid experience, particularly for scrolling and animations.
  • Gamers and app users who need better performance and multitasking capabilities.
  • Those who want the latest Android version and associated features.
  • Users who want a more versatile camera with a dedicated macro lens.

Use Cases:

  • Mobile gaming and graphically intensive apps.
  • Users who frequently scroll through social media feeds.
  • Casual photography, including detailed close-up shots.
  • Those who want to be able to take advantage of new Android features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. Battery Life vs. Performance: Do you value longer battery life, or is smoother, faster performance more important?
  2. Display Sharpness vs. Smoothness: Is a sharper display with more detail more appealing, or do you prefer a smoother, faster refresh rate?
  3. Android Version and Features: Do you need the latest Android version and features, or is an older version acceptable?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy Usage & Battery Life is Key: Choose the Xiaomi Poco M3. It's designed to last longer without charging, even if it means sacrificing performance and a smooth display.
  • Gaming & Performance is Key: Choose the Motorola Moto G53. The better processor and refresh rate make it much better for gaming and intensive use.
  • Mixed Usage, Modern OS is Key: Choose the Motorola Moto G53. It offers a smoother experience and is overall more modern in terms of software.

My Choice

If I had to choose between these two phones, I would choose the Motorola Moto G53. While I value the battery life of the Poco M3, the significant performance boost, the much smoother 120Hz display, and more modern software of the Moto G53 outweigh this advantage for me. I also appreciate having the macro camera option for closer photography. While the lower display resolution is noticeable, the 120hz refresh rate makes the whole experience much more fluid, and the better processor is worth it for faster app loading and more consistent performance. Finally the extra RAM and the newer bluetooth codecs are a plus.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.