Xiaomi Poco F6 vs Oppo Reno12 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 23, 2024 June 18, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 95.66 cm³ 89.39 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.73 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 179 g 180 g
Height 160.5 mm 161.5 mm
Width 74.5 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Green
  • Titanium
  • Space Brown
  • Sunset Gold
  • Nebula Silver
  • Manish Malhotra

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.8 % 89.4 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 2400 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.27 mAh/cm³ 55.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 735 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F6Oppo Reno12 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions160.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm161.5 x 74.8 x 7.4 mmAlmost identical in size, with the Reno slightly thinner. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight179g180gNegligible difference in weight.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without more information.
Display
Size6.67"6.7"Virtually identical screen sizes.
TypeAMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby VisionAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+Poco F6 supports Dolby Vision and significantly more colors (68B vs 1B), potentially offering better HDR performance and smoother color gradients.
Resolution1220 x 2712 (446 ppi)1080 x 2412 (394 ppi)Poco F6 has a sharper display due to higher resolution and pixel density, resulting in crisper text and images.
Peak Brightness2400 nits1200 nitsPoco F6 can get significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is generally considered a more powerful chipset, likely resulting in better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Poco F6's CPU architecture, featuring a Cortex-X4 core, suggests superior peak performance compared to the Reno12 Pro.
GPUAdreno 735Mali-G615 MC2Adreno 735 generally provides stronger graphics performance, benefiting gaming and other graphically intensive applications.
RAM12GB12GBBoth phones offer ample RAM for multitasking.
Storage512GB512GBBoth phones have the same storage capacity.
Camera
Rear Camera SpecsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare camera quality and features without detailed sensor and lens information.
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@60fps with EISUp to 4K@30fps with OIS and EIS; slow-mo up to 960fpsReno12 Pro boasts Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for potentially smoother videos, especially in low light, and offers higher frame rate slow-motion recording. Poco F6 offers 4K at 60fps.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacities suggest similar battery life, although real-world usage may vary based on optimization and usage patterns.
Charging SpeedNot SpecifiedNot SpecifiedCannot compare charging speeds without more information.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F6 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, brighter screen with Dolby Vision support provides a noticeable difference in visual quality.
  • More Powerful Performance: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset delivers significantly better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.

Oppo Reno12 Pro Advantages:

  • Potentially Better Video Stabilization: OIS provides an advantage in video recording, especially in scenarios with movement.
  • Higher Frame Rate Slow-Motion: Offers more dramatic slow-motion capture with 960fps recording.
  • More Color Options: Offers a wider variety of color choices.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F6: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and smooth multitasking. Suitable for gamers, power users, and content consumers who appreciate vibrant visuals.

Oppo Reno12 Pro: Suited for users who value video recording capabilities, especially those who frequently record videos on the go. The diverse color options may also appeal to users seeking stylistic choices.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your primary use case? (Gaming, content consumption, photography/videography, general use)
  2. What is your budget? (While both are mid-range, slight price differences might exist)
  3. Which features are most important to you? (Display quality, performance, camera features, battery life)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For a mobile gamer: The Poco F6 offers a clear advantage with its superior performance and sharper display.
  • For a content creator focused on video: The Reno12 Pro's OIS and high frame rate slow-motion are valuable features.
  • For a general user on a budget: The best choice depends on specific pricing and individual preferences for display quality versus video stabilization. If prices are similar, the Poco F6 generally offers more value due to its superior display and performance.
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.