Xiaomi Poco F6 vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date May 23, 2024 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 95.66 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.73 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 179 g 188.4 g
Height 160.5 mm 171.3 mm
Width 74.5 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Green
  • Titanium
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.8 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 2400 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.27 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 735 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco F6 vs. Motorola Razr 50: A Comparative Analysis

The mid-range smartphone arena heats up with the release of the Xiaomi Poco F6 and the Motorola Razr 50. Both devices boast impressive specs on paper, but how do they translate to real-world performance and which phone best suits your needs? Let's dive into a detailed analysis.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F6Motorola Razr 50Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions160.5 x 74.5 x 8mm171.3 x 74 x 7.3mm (Folded)Razr 50 significantly more compact when folded, Poco F6 thinner when unfolded. Impacts pocketability and one-handed use.
Weight179g188.4gRazr 50 slightly heavier but foldable design might feel balanced. Negligible difference in daily use.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 offers a unique form factor and the novelty of a folding screen. Poco F6 is a traditional slab design.
Display
Size6.67"6.9" (Main)Razr 50 offers a larger main display for immersive content consumption.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. Razr 50's folding display introduces a crease and potential durability concerns.
Peak Brightness2400 nits3000 nitsRazr 50 boasts superior peak brightness for better outdoor visibility.
Resolution1220 x 27121080 x 2640Poco F6 offers sharper visuals due to higher pixel density (446 ppi vs 413 ppi).
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8s Gen 3Dimensity 7300XSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 generally delivers superior performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Poco F6's CPU configuration suggests a performance advantage in multi-core workloads.
GPUAdreno 735Mali-G615 MC2Adreno 735 generally provides a better gaming experience with higher frame rates and graphical fidelity.
RAM12GB12GBBoth offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Storage512GB512GBBoth offer generous storage for apps, media, and files.
Battery Life
Capacity5000 mAh4200 mAhPoco F6 likely to offer longer battery life due to larger capacity. Razr 50's foldable design and larger main display could increase power consumption.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Powerhouse: The Poco F6, with its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, clearly targets performance enthusiasts. Expect smoother gaming, faster app loading, and superior multitasking compared to the Razr 50.
  • Compact and Chic: The Razr 50's foldable design makes it incredibly pocketable. Its unique form factor and stylish colors cater to those prioritizing portability and aesthetics.
  • Display Dilemma: While the Razr 50 boasts a larger and brighter display, the Poco F6 offers a higher resolution, resulting in sharper visuals. The Razr 50's crease might bother some users.
  • Battery Endurance: The Poco F6's larger battery capacity suggests a significant advantage in longevity. The Razr 50 might require more frequent charging, especially with heavy usage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco F6: Ideal for gamers, power users, and those prioritizing raw performance and longer battery life. Its robust specifications make it a strong contender for demanding tasks.
  • Razr 50: Best suited for style-conscious users who value portability and the novelty of a foldable phone. It's a great choice for those who prioritize compactness and unique design over peak performance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Consider:

  1. Is peak performance your priority? If yes, the Poco F6's superior processor and GPU make it the clear winner.
  2. How important is portability and a unique design? If compactness and style are paramount, the Razr 50's foldable design is hard to beat.
  3. What's your budget and tolerance for compromises? Both phones offer a compelling value proposition, but prioritize features based on your individual needs and budget constraints.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy gamer: Poco F6
  • Frequent traveler: Razr 50
  • Social media enthusiast: Either device, leaning towards Razr 50 for its larger display but considering Poco F6 for longer battery life.
  • Budget-conscious user seeking all-around performance: Poco F6

This analysis provides a framework for choosing between the Poco F6 and Razr 50. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual priorities and how you intend to use your smartphone.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.