Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date May 23, 2024 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 98.95 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.19 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 209 g 188.4 g
Height 160.9 mm 171.3 mm
Width 75 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 4000 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.53 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 740 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro vs. Motorola Razr 50

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F6 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mm (Unfolded)
Dimensions when folded not specified
The Razr 50 is significantly taller when unfolded but likely more compact when folded. Poco F6 Pro is thinner overall.
Weight209g188.4gRazr 50 is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use, especially important given its larger unfolded size.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50's foldable design offers portability and a unique form factor, potentially sacrificing durability and screen crease visibility.
Display
Size6.67"6.9"Razr 50 offers a slightly larger main screen.
TypeAMOLED, 68B colors, 120HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. Razr 50's LTPO panel may offer better power efficiency but with fewer color variations. The foldable nature introduces a potential crease.
Resolution1440 x 32001080 x 2640Poco F6 Pro boasts a sharper display (526 ppi vs 413 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Peak Brightness4000 nits3000 nitsPoco F6 Pro offers superior outdoor visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 significantly outperforms the Dimensity 7300X in demanding tasks like gaming and content creation.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Poco F6 Pro's CPU architecture provides a substantial performance advantage.
GPUAdreno 740Mali-G615 MC2Adreno 740 offers significantly better graphics performance, crucial for gaming and demanding applications.
RAM/Storage512GB/12GB, 1000GB/16GB512GB/12GBPoco F6 Pro offers a 1TB storage option for users needing extensive local storage.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4200 mAhPoco F6 Pro likely offers longer battery life due to larger capacity. Foldable design and larger display of Razr 50 may increase power consumption.
Camera
Video Capabilities8K@24fps, up to 720p@1920fps (EIS)4K@30fps, up to 1080p@60fps (EIS)Poco F6 Pro offers significantly more advanced video recording capabilities, including higher resolution and frame rates. Specific camera sensor details are missing for comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly more powerful CPU and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Sharper and Brighter Display: Higher resolution and peak brightness for a better visual experience.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Advanced Video Recording: Wider range of resolutions and frame rates.

Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Unique form factor for portability and style.
  • Lighter Weight: Easier to carry and use one-handed.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 50: Foldable design introduces potential durability concerns and screen crease. Performance is significantly lower.
  • Poco F6 Pro: Larger and heavier than Razr 50. Lacks the novelty of a foldable design.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro: Ideal for power users, gamers, content creators, and those prioritizing performance and display quality.

Motorola Razr 50: Suitable for users prioritizing portability and style above raw performance. Best for those who value a compact phone and appreciate the novelty of a foldable device.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is top-tier performance a priority? If yes, the Poco F6 Pro is the clear choice.
  2. How important is portability and a unique design? If paramount, the Razr 50's foldable design may be appealing.
  3. What is your budget and tolerance for compromises? Both are mid-range, but the Razr 50 sacrifices performance for its form factor.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy gamer: Poco F6 Pro
  • Business professional needing a compact phone: Razr 50
  • Content creator: Poco F6 Pro
  • User on a tight budget prioritizing style: Razr 50 (depending on specific pricing)
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.