Xiaomi Poco F5 vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 181 g 198 g
Height 161.1 mm 164.2 mm
Width 75 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 725 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5ZTE Blade V60 DesignPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6Poco F5 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)181198Poco F5 is noticeably lighter, more comfortable for extended use.
BuildMissingMissingBuild quality and materials unknown, impacting durability and feel.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDPoco F5 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency.
Display Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612Poco F5 has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Poco F5 provides smoother scrolling and animations.
HDRHDR10+, Dolby VisionNonePoco F5 supports HDR content, offering a wider dynamic range and more vibrant visuals in compatible media.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Poco F5 boasts a vastly more powerful and efficient processor, enabling significantly faster performance and better multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.91 GHz X2 & 3x2.49 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Poco F5's CPU architecture provides a significant performance advantage in demanding tasks and gaming.
GPUAdreno 725Mali-G57 MP1Poco F5 offers superior graphics performance for smoother gaming and faster rendering.
RAM8GB/12GB4GB/6GBPoco F5 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450While megapixels aren't everything, the Poco F5 likely captures more detail. Image quality depends on sensor and processing, which are partially unspecified for the ZTE.
Ultrawide8MPUnspecifiedPoco F5 offers ultrawide photography. ZTE's ultrawide capabilities are unclear.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps1080p@30fpsPoco F5 offers higher resolution and slow-motion video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity; real-world battery life depends on optimization and usage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 outclasses the Unisoc T606 in CPU and GPU performance, leading to a much smoother and faster user experience.
  • Superior display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate and HDR support offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth visuals.
  • More versatile camera: Offers higher resolution, 4K video recording, and an ultrawide lens.

ZTE Blade V60 Design Advantages:

  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Larger storage options: Offers 256GB storage even in the base model.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and a versatile camera. Ideal for gaming, media consumption, and mobile photography.

ZTE Blade V60 Design: Budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Suitable for users who prioritize affordability and ample storage.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Gaming and media consumption benefit greatly from the Poco F5's superior hardware.
  3. How important is display quality and camera performance? The Poco F5 significantly outperforms the ZTE in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Poco F5 is the clear choice due to its powerful processor and superior display.
  • Budget-conscious user: ZTE Blade V60 Design offers acceptable performance for basic tasks at a lower price.
  • Photographer/Videographer: Poco F5 provides better camera hardware and features.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

While the ZTE Blade V60 Design offers a budget-friendly option, the Xiaomi Poco F5 is the superior device overall. The significantly improved performance, higher quality display, and more versatile camera system provide a substantially better user experience. The price difference is justified by the substantial leap in capabilities. Even basic tasks will feel smoother and more responsive on the Poco F5 thanks to its powerful processor and high refresh rate display. The superior camera system and brighter, more colorful display also enhance the experience of capturing and viewing photos and videos. While I acknowledge the appeal of the ZTE's lower price, the performance and feature compromises are too significant for me to overlook.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.