Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 January 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 98.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.54 "/g
Weight 181 g 188.5 g
Height 161.1 mm 162.3 mm
Width 75 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Midnight Black
  • Ice Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Ocean Sunset

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 50.94 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 725 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9162.3 x 75.6 x 8Poco F5 is slightly smaller and thinner. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)181188.5Poco F5 is slightly lighter. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPreference-based. Side-mounted often faster, under-display more aesthetically integrated.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.67Identical screen size.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution and sharpness.
TypeAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Equally smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)10001800Redmi Note 13 significantly brighter outdoors.
HDRDolby Vision, HDR10+UnspecifiedPoco F5 supports wider HDR formats for better video playback quality.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm)Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)Poco F5 significantly more powerful for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.91 GHz X2 & 3x2.49 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz A73 & 4x1.9 GHz A53)Poco F5's newer CPU architecture offers significant performance and efficiency advantages.
GPUAdreno 725Adreno 610Poco F5 offers much better graphics performance for gaming.
RAM (GB)8/126/8More RAM in some Poco F5 variants enables better multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)64108Redmi Note 13 has higher resolution, but image quality depends on sensor and processing.
Ultrawide (MP)88Similar ultrawide capabilities.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps1080p@30fpsPoco F5 offers significantly better video resolution and slow-motion capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on usage and optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Significantly higher performance: The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 provides a substantial advantage in processing power and graphics rendering, resulting in smoother gaming, faster app loading, and better multitasking.
  • Superior video recording: 4K resolution and 120fps slow-motion recording offer significantly better video quality and creative options compared to the Redmi Note 13's 1080p@30fps.
  • Wider HDR support: Dolby Vision and HDR10+ ensure a better viewing experience for compatible content.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Advantages:

  • Brighter display: The 1800 nits peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility.
  • Potentially lower price: Depending on the specific variant and retailer, the Redmi Note 13 might offer a more budget-friendly option.
  • Longer software support: Redmi Note 13 has potential for longer software updates (up to Android 16).

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, enjoy mobile gaming, demand high-quality video recording, and appreciate a smooth user experience. Use cases: Demanding games, video editing, content creation.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G: Suitable for users who prioritize a bright display for outdoor use, primarily use their phone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography, and are on a tighter budget. Use cases: Casual browsing, social media, basic photography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi Note 13 is generally more affordable.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Gamers and power users will benefit from the Poco F5's performance.
  3. How important is outdoor visibility? The Redmi Note 13's brighter display excels in sunlight.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy gamer: Poco F5
  • Outdoor enthusiast: Redmi Note 13 4G
  • Budget-conscious social media user: Redmi Note 13 4G
  • Content creator: Poco F5

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

While the Redmi Note 13 4G offers a brighter display and potentially lower price, the Poco F5's superior performance, significantly better video recording capabilities, and broader HDR support make it the more compelling choice for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience for demanding tasks and appreciate having the option for high-quality video recording. The difference in chipset generations between the two phones represents a significant leap in performance and future-proofing. While the Redmi Note 13's brighter screen is appealing, I find the overall performance advantage of the Poco F5 more significant for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.