Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 November 10, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 181 g 192 g
Height 161.1 mm 168 mm
Width 75 mm 78 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Midnight Black
  • Glacier White
  • Navy Blue
  • Clover Green

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 725 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5Xiaomi Redmi 13CPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9168 x 78 x 8.1Poco F5 is noticeably smaller and thinner, making it more pocketable and easier to handle.
Weight (g)181192Poco F5 is lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDPoco F5's AMOLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency.
Display Size (inches)6.676.74Redmi 13C has a slightly larger screen, but the difference is negligible.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1600Poco F5 has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images. Redmi 13C's lower resolution will be noticeable in everyday use.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Poco F5's higher refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, leading to a more fluid user experience.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2Helio G85Poco F5 offers significantly better CPU and GPU performance, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Poco F5's more modern and powerful CPU architecture provides a substantial performance advantage.
RAM (GB)8/124/6/8More RAM in certain Poco F5 variants allows for better multitasking and smoother performance with demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450While megapixels aren't everything, the Poco F5's main camera likely offers better detail and low-light performance, particularly considering the superior processing power of the Snapdragon chipset.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsPoco F5 supports higher resolution video recording and features Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both phones have the same battery capacity, but the Poco F5's AMOLED display and more efficient processor likely result in better battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset provides a substantial advantage in speed and responsiveness for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior display: The AMOLED display offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and a higher refresh rate for a smoother and more visually appealing experience.
  • More compact design: Smaller dimensions and lighter weight make it more comfortable for one-handed use and portability.

Xiaomi Redmi 13C Advantages:

  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable, making it accessible to budget-conscious buyers.
  • Larger display: While resolution is lower, some users may prefer the larger screen size for media consumption.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Price: The Redmi 13C sacrifices performance for affordability.
  • Display Quality vs. Price: The Redmi 13C's IPS LCD panel offers a less impressive visual experience compared to the Poco F5's AMOLED.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a smooth and vibrant display, and a premium feel. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and multitasking.

Xiaomi Redmi 13C: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Acceptable for casual gaming and media consumption but may struggle with more demanding applications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi 13C is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For demanding tasks, the Poco F5 is necessary. For basic use, the Redmi 13C may suffice.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Poco F5 significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Poco F5 for its superior performance and smoother display.
  • Budget-conscious student: Redmi 13C for its affordability and basic functionality.
  • Content creator: Poco F5 for its powerful processor and higher resolution display.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

While the Redmi 13C offers excellent value for its price, the Poco F5's superior performance, vibrant AMOLED display, and smoother 120Hz refresh rate are compelling advantages for a slightly higher cost. The significant difference in processing power and display quality would greatly enhance my daily user experience. I prioritize a fluid and responsive phone for multitasking, media consumption, and occasional gaming, making the Poco F5 the clear winner for me. The more compact form factor is also a plus.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.