Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Xiaomi Redmi 12 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 June 15, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 105.49 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 181 g 198.5 g
Height 161.1 mm 168.6 mm
Width 75 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Midnight Black
  • Polar Silver
  • Sky Blue
  • Moonstone Silver

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.79 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 550 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 108.45 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 47.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 725 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5Xiaomi Redmi 12Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9168.6 x 76.3 x 8.2Poco F5 is slightly smaller and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)181198.5Poco F5 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialMissingMissingMaterial affects durability and premium feel; information needed for comparison.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDPoco F5's AMOLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency in dark mode.
Display Size (inches)6.676.79Redmi 12 has a marginally larger screen, providing slightly more viewing area.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2460Negligible difference in sharpness due to similar pixel density.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Poco F5's 120Hz display provides smoother animations and scrolling compared to Redmi 12's 90Hz.
HDRHDR10+, Dolby VisionNone specifiedPoco F5 supports HDR content, resulting in a significantly better video viewing experience with compatible content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm)Helio G88 (12nm)Poco F5's significantly more powerful processor offers vastly superior performance in demanding tasks and gaming. The 4nm process also implies better power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.91 GHz X2 & 3x2.49 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Poco F5's CPU architecture is newer and more powerful, leading to much faster processing speeds.
GPUAdreno 725Mali-G52 MC2Poco F5's GPU is significantly more capable, enabling smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM8GB/12GB4GB/6GB/8GBMore RAM in Poco F5 (in some variants) allows for better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450While megapixels aren't everything, Poco F5's higher resolution main sensor potentially captures more detail.
Sensor Size1/2"1/2.76"Poco F5's larger sensor likely performs better in low-light conditions and offers slightly shallower depth of field.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps1080p@30fpsPoco F5 offers superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity suggests comparable battery life, although real-world usage will vary due to different processors and displays.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 outclasses the Helio G88 in every aspect.
  • Superior display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate offers a smoother and more visually appealing experience.
  • More capable camera system: Larger sensor, higher resolution, and better video recording capabilities.
  • Lighter and more compact: Easier to handle and carry.

Xiaomi Redmi 12 Advantages:

  • Lower price: Offers a more budget-friendly option.
  • Slightly larger display: Provides marginally more screen real estate.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a smooth and vibrant display, and mobile gaming. Suitable for demanding tasks, content creation, and media consumption.

Xiaomi Redmi 12: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Less demanding gaming is possible but performance limitations should be expected.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi 12 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Demanding tasks and gaming favor the Poco F5.
  3. How important is display quality and smoothness? The Poco F5's AMOLED and 120Hz are major advantages.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy gamer: Poco F5
  • Budget-conscious social media user: Redmi 12
  • Photographer/Videographer: Poco F5

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

While the Redmi 12 offers an attractive price point, the Poco F5's superior performance, display, and camera system make it the clear winner for me. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 provides a significant leap in processing power, ensuring a smooth and responsive user experience. The AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate is a joy to use, and the enhanced camera capabilities offer more creative possibilities. The price difference is justified by the substantial upgrade in overall user experience. I value a fluid and responsive phone for both productivity and entertainment, making the Poco F5 a better fit for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.