Xiaomi Poco F5 vs vivo V29 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo V29
vivo V29
Vivo

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 September 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 91.62 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 181 g 186 g
Height 161.1 mm 164.2 mm
Width 75 mm 74.4 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 7.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Space Black
  • Himalayan Blue
  • Purple Fairy
  • Majestic Red

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 100.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 50.21 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4600 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 725 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5vivo V29Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9164.2 x 74.4 x 7.5Vivo V29 is slightly larger and heavier.
Weight (g)181186Negligible weight difference in practical use.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPersonal preference; both are fast and reliable.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.78Vivo V29 offers a slightly larger screen.
Resolution1080 x 24001260 x 2800Vivo V29 has a sharper display with higher pixel density (453 ppi vs 402 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
TypeAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both provide smooth scrolling and animations.
Color Depth68B1BVivo V29 boasts a 1 Billion color display, offering smoother color gradations, especially noticeable in HDR content.
HDR SupportDolby Vision, HDR10+HDR10+Poco F5 supports Dolby Vision, potentially providing better HDR performance in supported content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2Snapdragon 778G+Poco F5 utilizes a significantly more powerful and newer chipset, resulting in noticeably faster performance in demanding tasks and games.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)The superior CPU architecture of the Poco F5 translates to smoother multitasking and faster app loading times.
GPUAdreno 725Adreno 642LPoco F5's GPU offers better gaming performance and graphics rendering.
RAM8GB/12GB8GB/12GBBoth offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450While megapixels aren't everything, the Poco F5 provides more detail in well-lit conditions thanks to its higher resolution sensor. Information on sensor size and pixel size is missing for the Vivo V29 making a detailed comparison difficult.
Video Recording4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p up to 120fps with EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30fpsPoco F5 offers more versatile video recording options with higher frame rates and EIS at various resolutions.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004600Poco F5 offers longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 provides a considerable performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Longer battery life: The 5000 mAh battery will likely last longer on a single charge.
  • More versatile video recording: Higher frame rates and EIS at various resolutions provide greater flexibility.
  • Dolby Vision support: Potentially better HDR experience in compatible content.

vivo V29 Advantages:

  • Sharper display: Higher resolution and pixel density result in a crisper viewing experience.
  • Wider color gamut: 1 Billion colors offer smoother color transitions, particularly beneficial for HDR content.
  • Slightly larger display: More screen real estate for media consumption.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, battery life, and value. Best for:

  • Mobile gamers
  • Power users who multitask heavily
  • Users who demand long battery life

vivo V29: Suitable for users who prioritize display quality and design aesthetics. Best for:

  • Media consumers who value a vibrant and sharp display
  • Users who prefer a slightly larger screen size

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F5 generally offers better value for its price.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and demanding tasks favor the Poco F5, while media consumption favors the Vivo V29.
  3. How important is battery life? The Poco F5 is likely to provide longer battery life.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

While the Vivo V29 offers a slightly better display, the Xiaomi Poco F5's superior performance, longer battery life, and more versatile video recording capabilities make it the more compelling device for me. The significant difference in processing power, coupled with the lower price point, makes the Poco F5 a better value proposition overall. I prioritize smooth performance and long battery life over a slightly larger and sharper display. The inclusion of Dolby Vision is also a plus for me. While subjective, I also prefer a side-mounted fingerprint sensor. The performance difference between the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 and Snapdragon 778G+ is substantial and would significantly impact my daily usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.