Xiaomi Poco F5 vs vivo iQOO 12 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 November 14, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 100.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 181 g 198.5 g
Height 161.1 mm 163.2 mm
Width 75 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Black
  • Red
  • White (BMW M branding)

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 89.6 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1400 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 49.83 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 725 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5vivo iQOO 12Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9163.2 x 75.9 x 8.1iQOO 12 is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)181198.5Poco F5 is noticeably lighter, more comfortable for extended use.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPreference-based, both reliable.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.78Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24001260 x 2800iQOO 12 has a sharper display with higher pixel density (453 ppi vs 395 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate120Hz144HziQOO 12 offers smoother animations and scrolling, especially noticeable in gaming and fast-paced content.
Panel TypeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLEDiQOO 12's LTPO panel allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery life.
Peak Brightness1000 nits3000 nitsiQOO 12 is significantly brighter, ensuring better visibility outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2Snapdragon 8 Gen 3iQOO 12 boasts a flagship-level processor, offering significantly better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (up to 2.91 GHz)Octa-core (up to 3.3 GHz)iQOO 12 has a faster, more powerful CPU architecture.
GPUAdreno 725Adreno 750iQOO 12's GPU delivers superior graphics performance, crucial for high-end gaming and graphically intensive applications.
RAM8/12GB12/16GBiQOO 12 offers larger RAM options, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with numerous apps.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.7950MP, f/1.69iQOO 12's larger sensor and wider aperture likely result in better low-light performance.
Ultrawide8MP50MPiQOO 12 offers a significantly better ultrawide camera with much higher resolution.
TelephotoNone64MPiQOO 12 has a dedicated telephoto lens, enabling optical zoom capabilities.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 8K@30fpsiQOO 12 supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on usage and software optimization.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare charging speeds without specific data.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: More comfortable for one-handed use and extended periods.
  • More Affordable: Offers good value for its performance.

vivo iQOO 12 Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, refresh rate, and peak brightness contribute to a premium viewing experience.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Inclusion of a telephoto lens and a high-resolution ultrawide sensor expands photographic capabilities.
  • Faster Storage: UFS 4.0 enables quicker app loading and data transfer compared to UFS 3.1 (assuming Poco F5 uses UFS 3.1, as it's common for its chipset).

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize a lightweight phone with good performance for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming.

vivo iQOO 12: Ideal for power users, mobile gamers, and photography enthusiasts who demand top-tier performance, a stunning display, and a versatile camera system.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F5 offers excellent value, while the iQOO 12 commands a premium price for its flagship features.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For everyday tasks and casual gaming, the Poco F5 is sufficient. For demanding gaming, content creation, and photography, the iQOO 12 is better suited.
  3. Do you prioritize portability and comfort? The Poco F5's lighter weight and smaller size make it more comfortable for extended use.

My Choice: vivo iQOO 12

While the Poco F5 offers excellent value, the vivo iQOO 12's superior performance, display, and camera system make it the more compelling choice for me. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with the high refresh rate LTPO AMOLED screen, promises a significantly smoother and more responsive user experience. The versatile camera setup with a dedicated telephoto lens is also a major draw. I'm willing to pay the premium for the substantial upgrade in overall quality and future-proofing offered by the iQOO 12. The slightly larger size and weight are acceptable trade-offs for the significant gains in performance and features.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.