Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 181 g 185 g
Height 161.1 mm 164.6 mm
Width 75 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 725 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5Realme C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6Poco F5 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)181185Negligible weight difference.
BuildMissingMissingBuild quality cannot be compared.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.67Same screen size.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1604Poco F5 has a significantly sharper and more detailed display. Realme C65's display will appear pixelated.
Panel TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDPoco F5 offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency due to AMOLED technology.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzPoco F5 provides smoother animations and scrolling.
HDRHDR10+, Dolby VisionNone specifiedPoco F5 offers a significantly enhanced viewing experience with HDR support for compatible content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm)Helio G85 (12 nm)Poco F5 offers significantly better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming capabilities.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.91 GHz X2 & 3x2.49 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Poco F5's more modern and powerful CPU architecture provides a substantial performance advantage.
GPUAdreno 725Mali-G52 MC2Poco F5's GPU is considerably more powerful, enabling better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM8/12GB6/8GBPoco F5 offers more RAM options for better multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera64MP (Omnivision OV64B)50MP (Samsung S5KJN1)While megapixel count is higher on the Poco F5, image quality depends on sensor size, processing, and other factors. Direct comparison is difficult without image samples.
Ultrawide8MPNot specifiedPoco F5 offers ultrawide photography.
Macro2MP2MPSimilar macro capabilities, but practical usability of 2MP macro is limited.
Selfie16MP8MPPoco F5 likely offers better selfie image quality.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps1080p@30fpsPoco F5 offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity. Actual battery life depends on usage and optimization.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCharging speed comparison is not possible.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 significantly outperforms the Helio G85 in all aspects.
  • Better Display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate and HDR support provides a significantly enhanced visual experience.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Includes an ultrawide lens and higher resolution sensors. Superior video recording capabilities.

Realme C65 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Based on available pricing information, the Realme C65 is likely cheaper.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and versatile camera capabilities. Ideal for gaming, media consumption, and mobile photography.

Realme C65: Budget-conscious users who primarily need a large screen and basic smartphone functionality. Suitable for light usage, social media, and browsing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Realme C65 is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your performance requirements? For demanding tasks like gaming, the Poco F5 is a must.
  3. How important is display quality? The Poco F5's AMOLED display is far superior.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Poco F5
  • Photographer/Videographer: Poco F5
  • Casual User on a Budget: Realme C65

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

Reasons:

The Poco F5 offers a significantly better overall package. The superior processor, display, and camera system justify the likely price difference for most users. While the Realme C65 might be suitable for extremely budget-conscious buyers with minimal performance needs, the Poco F5's advantages in crucial areas like display and performance make it a much more compelling device in the long run. The smoother user experience, better gaming capabilities, and higher quality media consumption offered by the Poco F5 are substantial benefits that outweigh the potential cost savings of the Realme C65. Furthermore, the inclusion of an ultrawide lens adds valuable versatility to the camera system.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.