Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Realme C51 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C51
Realme C51
Realme

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 August 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 102.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 181 g 186 g
Height 161.1 mm 167.2 mm
Width 75 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Mint Green
  • Carbon Black

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 48.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 725 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5Realme C51Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9167.2 x 76.7 x 8Poco F5 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)181186Negligible weight difference.
BuildMaterial information missing for both. Impacts durability and premium feel.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDPoco F5 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency.
Display Size (inches)6.676.74Realme C51 has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1600Poco F5 has a significantly sharper display (395 ppi vs 260 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Poco F5 provides smoother scrolling and animations.
HDRHDR10+, Dolby VisionNo HDRPoco F5 offers superior dynamic range and brighter highlights in compatible content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm)Unisoc Tiger T612 (12nm)Poco F5 boasts a significantly more powerful and efficient processor, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Poco F5's CPU architecture is considerably more advanced, delivering superior performance.
GPUAdreno 725Mali-G57Poco F5 offers much stronger graphics performance for demanding games and applications.
RAM8GB/12GB4GB/6GBPoco F5 offers more RAM for smoother multitasking and better performance under heavy load.
Camera
Main Camera64MP (Omnivision OV64B)50MP (Samsung S5KJN1)While megapixels aren't everything, the Poco F5 likely offers better low-light performance and detail thanks to its larger sensor (1/2") compared to the C51 (1/2.76").
Ultrawide8MPNot specifiedPoco F5 offers ultrawide photography for capturing wider scenes.
Video Recording4K@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsPoco F5 supports higher resolution video recording with electronic image stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on usage and efficiency of other components.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset offers a substantial performance advantage over the Unisoc Tiger T612 in all aspects, including gaming, multitasking, and app loading.
  • Much better display: The AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate and HDR support delivers a vastly improved visual experience with vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother animations.
  • Higher resolution camera: The 64MP main camera and inclusion of an ultrawide lens offer more versatile photography options.

Realme C51 Advantages:

  • Lower price: The Realme C51 is significantly cheaper, making it more accessible for budget-conscious buyers.
  • Slightly larger display: While resolution is lower, the slightly larger screen size might be preferred by some users for media consumption.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Poco F5: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and a versatile camera. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and multitasking.

Realme C51: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Not recommended for demanding applications or heavy multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Realme C51 is a budget-friendly option, while the Poco F5 is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the C51 might suffice. For demanding tasks, the Poco F5 is necessary.
  3. How important is display quality and performance to you? The Poco F5 significantly outperforms the C51 in these areas.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

While the Realme C51 offers an attractive price point, the Xiaomi Poco F5 is the clear winner for me. The superior performance, vastly improved display, and more versatile camera system justify the higher price. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a powerful chip that will provide a smooth and enjoyable user experience for years to come. The 120Hz AMOLED display is a significant upgrade over the C51's lower resolution IPS LCD. For a mid-range device, the Poco F5 offers exceptional value and future-proofing. The performance difference alone would heavily impact daily usage, making the Poco F5 a much more enjoyable and frustration-free device to use in the long run.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.