Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Oppo Reno12 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 90.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.79 "/g
Weight 181 g 177 g
Height 161.1 mm 161.4 mm
Width 75 mm 74.1 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Matte Brown
  • Sunset Pink
  • Astro Silver

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 90.3 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 55.01 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 725 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5Oppo Reno12Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9161.4 x 74.1 x 7.6Virtually identical in size and feel.
Weight (g)181177Negligible weight difference in hand.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPreference-based; under-display is modern, side-mounted can be faster.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.7Negligible size difference.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2412Nearly identical sharpness.
Panel TypeAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Equally smooth scrolling and animations.
Color Depth68B1BReno12's 1B color offers smoother color gradients, potentially more accurate color reproduction.
Peak Brightness (nits)10001200Reno12 will be more visible in direct sunlight.
HDRHDR10+, Dolby VisionHDR10+Poco F5 supports Dolby Vision for enhanced HDR content on supported platforms.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2Dimensity 7300Both are upper mid-range chipsets, but benchmarks suggest Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 offers a noticeable performance advantage in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.91 GHz X2, 3x2.49 GHz A710, 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Snapdragon's newer architecture and higher clock speeds likely translate to faster processing.
GPUAdreno 725Mali-G615 MC2Adreno 725 generally offers better gaming performance.
RAM (GB)8/1212Reno12's base model having 12GB RAM could offer better multitasking; Poco F5 also offers a 12GB option.
Storage256GB256GB/512GBReno12 offers a 512GB option for users needing more storage.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Megapixel count isn't everything; image quality depends on sensor size, processing, and other factors.
Selfie Camera (MP)1632Reno12 boasts a higher resolution selfie camera, potentially capturing more detail.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps4K@30fps, 1080p@480fps, 720p@960fpsReno12 offers more advanced slow-motion video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery life expected, though real-world usage varies.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Potentially Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 generally benchmarks higher than the Dimensity 7300.
  • Dolby Vision: Offers a better HDR experience in supported content.

Oppo Reno12 Advantages:

  • Brighter Display: Easier to view outdoors in bright sunlight.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera & Slow-Motion Video: Caters to selfie enthusiasts and content creators.
  • More RAM in Base Model: 12GB ensures smooth multitasking even with heavy usage.
  • Larger Storage Option: 512GB provides ample space for apps, photos, and videos.
  • More Recent OS: Starts with Android 14 and potentially longer support lifespan.

Trade-offs:

  • Poco F5: Potentially lower camera performance in certain scenarios compared to the Reno12.
  • Reno12: Higher price for the increased storage and RAM.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Suitable for users prioritizing performance and value, especially gamers and power users on a budget.

Oppo Reno12: Ideal for users who value a bright display, excellent selfie camera, ample storage, and the latest Android features. Well-suited for social media enthusiasts, content creators, and those who prioritize a longer software update cycle.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Reno12 is generally more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and performance (Poco F5) vs. photography, social media, and longevity (Reno12).
  3. Do you prioritize raw performance or features like a brighter display and better selfie camera?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Focus on Gaming: Poco F5
  • Content Creation and Social Media Focus: Reno12
  • Latest OS and Future-Proofing: Reno12

My Choice: Oppo Reno12

While the Poco F5 offers compelling performance for its price, the Oppo Reno12's overall package is more appealing to me. The brighter display, superior selfie camera, larger storage option, and more recent OS with a potentially longer update cycle outweigh the performance advantage of the Poco F5 for my personal needs. I prioritize a well-rounded device with a long lifespan and features that enhance everyday usage, and the Reno12 delivers on those fronts. The extra cost is justified by the enhanced feature set and future-proofing offered by the Reno12.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.