Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Nothing Phone (2) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 July 17, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 106.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 181 g 201.2 g
Height 161.1 mm 162.1 mm
Width 75 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • White
  • Dark Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 87.2 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1600 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 104.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 44.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 725 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5Nothing Phone (2)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9162.1 x 76.4 x 8.6Poco F5 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)181201.2Poco F5 is noticeably lighter, more comfortable for extended use.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials impact durability and premium feel, but cannot be compared here.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.7Virtually identical screen sizes.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 24001080 x 2412Negligible difference in resolution.
TypeAMOLEDLTPO OLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate, potentially saving battery.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)10001600Nothing Phone (2) significantly brighter outdoors.
Color Depth68B1BNothing Phone (2) boasts superior color accuracy and a wider color gamut, beneficial for content creation and consumption.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Nothing Phone (2) has a more powerful processor, leading to better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (up to 2.91 GHz)Octa-core (up to 3.0 GHz)Nothing Phone (2) has slightly faster clock speeds.
GPUAdreno 725Adreno 730Nothing Phone (2)'s GPU offers better graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive applications.
RAM (GB)8/128/12Both offer ample RAM for multitasking.
Camera
Rear Camera64MP Main, 8MP Ultrawide, 2MP Macro50MP Main, 50MP UltrawideBoth have dual rear cameras. Megapixel count doesn't tell the whole story; image quality depends on sensor size, aperture, and processing.
Front Camera16MP32MPNothing Phone (2) has a higher resolution front camera.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 4K@60fpsNothing Phone (2) can record higher quality video at 60fps.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004700Poco F5 has a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCharging speed significantly impacts usability, but cannot be compared here.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: Easier to handle and carry.
  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity.
  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable.

Nothing Phone (2) Advantages:

  • Significantly Brighter Display: Better outdoor visibility.
  • More Powerful Processor and GPU: Smoother performance, better gaming.
  • Higher Quality Display: Wider color gamut and better color accuracy.
  • Higher Resolution Front Camera: Better selfies.
  • Higher Quality Video Recording: 4K@60fps.
  • Longer Software Support: Guaranteed updates to Android 16.

Trade-offs:

  • Poco F5 sacrifices performance and display quality for a lower price and potentially longer battery life.
  • Nothing Phone (2) sacrifices battery capacity and portability for higher performance and a superior display.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and portability for everyday tasks like social media, web browsing, and light gaming.

Nothing Phone (2): Users who demand top-tier performance for demanding applications, gaming, and content creation. Users who value a high-quality display for media consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F5 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and demanding apps benefit from the Nothing Phone (2)'s power.
  3. How important is battery life and portability? The Poco F5 excels in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy gamer: Nothing Phone (2)
  • Photographer/Videographer: Nothing Phone (2)
  • Casual user on a budget: Poco F5
  • User who prioritizes all-day battery life: Poco F5

My Choice: Nothing Phone (2)

While the Poco F5 offers great value, the Nothing Phone (2)'s superior performance, stunning display, and longer software support make it the better choice for me. I prioritize a smooth user experience, especially for gaming and media consumption, and I'm willing to pay a premium for that. The brighter display is crucial for outdoor use, and the guaranteed software updates provide peace of mind. While the slightly lower battery capacity is a consideration, the performance and display benefits outweigh this for my personal needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.