Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 181 g 171 g
Height 161.1 mm 161.9 mm
Width 75 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 725 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5Motorola Moto G85Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9161.9 x 73.1 x 7.6Poco F5 slightly shorter, narrower, but thicker. Moto G85 slightly lighter and thinner overall. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)181171
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPreference-based. Under-display feels more modern, side-mounted often faster and more reliable.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDP-OLEDBoth offer excellent contrast and deep blacks. P-OLED potentially more power efficient, especially with dark mode.
Size (inches)6.676.67Identical screen size.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution, resulting in similar sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Color Depth68B1BMoto G85 boasts a wider color gamut, resulting in more vibrant and accurate colors. Noticeable difference for media consumption.
Peak Brightness (nits)10001600Moto G85 significantly brighter, crucial for outdoor visibility.
HDR SupportDolby Vision, HDR10+None specifiedPoco F5 supports wider HDR formats, offering better dynamic range in supported content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2Snapdragon 6s Gen 3Poco F5 has a significantly more powerful processor, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.91 GHz X2 & 3x2.49 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)
GPUAdreno 725Adreno 619Superior GPU in Poco F5 translates to noticeably better gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM (GB)8/1212While Moto G85 has 12GB in the compared variant, Poco F5 also offers a 12GB option. More RAM generally benefits multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450
Ultrawide (MP)88Similar ultrawide capabilities.
Selfie Camera (MP)1632Moto G85 has a higher resolution selfie camera, potentially capturing more detail.
Video Recording4K@30fps with EIS1080p@60fpsPoco F5 can record higher resolution video but Moto G85's video score on DxOMark is significantly better (109 vs unspecified for the Poco F5), indicating superior video quality in real-world usage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on usage and optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 outclasses the Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 in CPU and GPU performance.
  • Higher resolution video recording: Offers 4K recording compared to the Moto G85's 1080p.
  • Wider HDR support: Dolby Vision and HDR10+ enhance video viewing experience.

Motorola Moto G85 Advantages:

  • Brighter display: Much higher peak brightness ensures better outdoor visibility.
  • Wider color gamut: 1B colors offer a more vibrant and accurate display.
  • Higher resolution selfie camera: Potentially better for video calls and self-portraits.
  • Better video quality: Despite lower resolution recording capability, the DxOMark score suggests superior video quality in practice.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Ideal for users prioritizing performance, gaming, and consuming HDR content. Suitable for demanding tasks and heavy multitasking.

Motorola Moto G85: Suitable for users who prioritize display quality, battery life, and a good selfie camera. Great for social media, casual gaming, and general use. Outdoor usage is enhanced by the brighter display.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Both phones are in the medium price range, but minor price differences might exist.
  2. What are your primary use cases? (Gaming, media consumption, photography, social media)
  3. Which features are most important to you? (Performance, display quality, camera quality, battery life)

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

While the Motorola Moto G85 offers a stunning display and potentially better video quality for everyday use, the Xiaomi Poco F5's superior performance is the deciding factor for me. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 provides a significant boost in speed and responsiveness, which is crucial for a smooth and enjoyable user experience in the long run. I prioritize performance and future-proofing my device, and the Poco F5 delivers that better. I am willing to compromise slightly on display brightness and color gamut for the significant performance advantage. The ability to record in 4K is also a plus, even if the Moto G85 might deliver better 1080p video in practice. Ultimately, the Poco F5 provides a more well-rounded package for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.