Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Motorola Moto G34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 December 29, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 97.1 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 181 g 179 g
Height 161.1 mm 162.7 mm
Width 75 mm 74.6 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Ice Blue
  • Ocean Green
  • Charcoal Black
  • Vanilla Cream

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 84 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 51.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Adreno 725 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5Motorola Moto G34Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9162.7 x 74.6 x 8Poco F5 is slightly smaller and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)181179Virtually identical weight.
BuildMaterial specifications missing for both. Can't compare durability or premium feel.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDPoco F5 offers more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.676.5Poco F5 has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1600Significantly sharper and more detailed visuals on the Poco F5 due to higher resolution. Impacts clarity of text, images, and videos.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate.
HDRHDR10+, Dolby VisionUnspecifiedPoco F5 supports HDR content, resulting in a wider dynamic range and more realistic visuals in compatible content. Moto G34's HDR capabilities are unclear.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm)Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm)Poco F5 boasts significantly better CPU and GPU performance due to a more powerful and efficient chipset. Impacts gaming, multitasking, and app loading speeds.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.91 GHz X2 & 3x2.49 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Poco F5's superior CPU architecture and higher clock speeds translate to noticeably faster performance.
GPUAdreno 725Adreno 619Poco F5's GPU is much more powerful, enabling smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM8GB/12GB4GB/8GBPoco F5 offers more RAM in its configurations, leading to better multitasking and app performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Poco F5 has a higher resolution main sensor. Doesn't guarantee better image quality but offers more detail.
Ultrawide (MP)8Unspecified, but "FOV 118° ultra-wide angle" suggests it has oneBoth seemingly have an ultrawide lens, but the resolution for Moto G34 is unclear.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps with EISUp to 1080p@30fpsPoco F5 offers higher resolution video recording and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) at higher resolutions.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on software optimization and usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor and GPU, resulting in smoother gaming, multitasking, and overall responsiveness.
  • Better Display: AMOLED technology provides more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency compared to the Moto G34's IPS LCD. Higher resolution also delivers sharper visuals.
  • More Versatile Camera: Higher resolution main camera and higher resolution video recording capabilities.

Motorola Moto G34 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Based on provided pricing data, the Moto G34 appears to be more affordable.
  • More Color Options: Offers a wider variety of color choices.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and a versatile camera. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and media consumption.

Motorola Moto G34: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality and reliable battery life. Best for casual usage like web browsing, social media, and communication.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G34 is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your performance needs? The Poco F5 offers a significant performance advantage.
  3. How important is display quality? The Poco F5's AMOLED display is superior.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

While the Motorola Moto G34 might be more budget-friendly, the Xiaomi Poco F5 offers a significantly better overall package. Its superior processor, stunning AMOLED display, and more versatile camera make it a much more compelling device for the majority of users. The performance difference alone would significantly impact daily usage, making the Poco F5 a more future-proof investment. While I acknowledge the potential price difference, the enhanced user experience offered by the Poco F5 outweighs the cost savings for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.