Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Google Pixel Fold - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 June 27, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 128.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 2.69 "/g
Weight 181 g 283 g
Height 161.1 mm 139.7 mm
Width 75 mm 158.7 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 5.8 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 7.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1840 x 2208
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 82.7 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 378 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 1450 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 83.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 37.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4821 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 725 Mali-G710 MP7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5Google Pixel FoldPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8 (folded)
139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1 (unfolded)
Pixel Fold significantly smaller when folded, but thicker and wider when unfolded due to its foldable nature. Poco F5 is a more traditional, pocketable size.
Weight (g)181283Pixel Fold is noticeably heavier due to its complex hinge mechanism and larger overall size.
FoldableNoYesPixel Fold offers a larger inner display for tablet-like functionality and a smaller outer display for quick interactions. Poco F5 is a standard slab phone.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDFoldable OLEDPoco F5's AMOLED offers vibrant colors and deep blacks. Pixel Fold's foldable OLED introduces a crease but allows for a larger screen in a smaller form factor.
Display Size (inches)6.677.6 (inner), 5.8 (outer)Pixel Fold's larger inner display provides more screen real estate for multitasking and media consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001840 x 2208 (inner), 1080 x 2092 (outer)Both offer sharp displays, but the Pixel Fold's inner display boasts a higher resolution for greater detail.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both phones offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to their 120Hz refresh rates.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2Google Tensor G2Both chipsets are powerful, but benchmarks suggest Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 might have a slight edge in raw performance. Tensor G2 excels in AI and machine learning tasks.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Both are powerful CPUs, but architectural differences exist. Practical performance differences likely negligible for average users.
RAM (GB)8/1212Pixel Fold offers more RAM, potentially benefiting multitasking and demanding applications.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)64 MP Main + 8 MP Wide + 2 MP Macro48 MP Main + 10.8 MP Wide + 10.8 MP TelephotoPixel Fold has a more versatile camera system with a telephoto lens for optical zoom. Poco F5 relies on digital zoom. Pixel Fold also leverages Google's superior image processing.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004821Similar battery capacities, but real-world battery life depends on usage and software optimization. Foldable displays often consume more power.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Lighter and More Pocketable: Easier to carry and use one-handed.
  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Traditional display technology may consume less power.

Google Pixel Fold Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers a larger screen for productivity and media consumption in a compact form factor.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Telephoto lens enables optical zoom. Google's image processing algorithms generally produce superior photos.
  • More RAM: Better for multitasking and future-proofing.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize performance, battery life, and a traditional smartphone experience. Excellent for gaming, social media, and everyday tasks.

Google Pixel Fold: Best suited for users who value innovation and want a device that can seamlessly transition between phone and tablet modes. Excellent for productivity, multitasking, and media consumption on the go.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend?
  2. Form Factor: Do you prioritize portability or a larger screen? Are you willing to compromise on weight and thickness for a foldable device?
  3. Usage: What are your primary smartphone needs (e.g., gaming, photography, productivity)?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Focus on Performance: Xiaomi Poco F5
  • Desire for Innovation and Large Screen: Google Pixel Fold
  • Photographer/Videographer: Google Pixel Fold (due to superior camera system)

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

While the Pixel Fold is an exciting innovation, the Xiaomi Poco F5 offers a compelling combination of performance, battery life, and affordability. As someone who prioritizes a lightweight and pocketable device with excellent performance for everyday tasks and occasional gaming, the Poco F5 better suits my needs. The significant price difference makes it a more practical choice for me, as the foldable technology doesn't outweigh the benefits of the Poco F5 in my personal use case. I acknowledge the superior camera system of the Pixel Fold, but the Poco F5's camera is still more than adequate for my needs. Ultimately, the Poco F5 provides excellent value for its price.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.