Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.45 cm³ 88.78 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 181 g 199 g
Height 161.1 mm 149.6 mm
Width 75 mm 71.5 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Black Titanium
  • White Titanium
  • Natural Titanium
  • Desert Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.3 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1206 x 2622
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 90.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 90.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.38 mAh/cm³ 40.35 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3582 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) Apple A18 Pro (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Hexa-core (2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz)
GPU Adreno 725 Apple GPU (6-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 13 18
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5Apple iPhone 16 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 75 x 7.9149.6 x 71.5 x 8.3iPhone 16 Pro is noticeably smaller and slightly thicker. Poco F5 is taller and wider.
Weight (g)181199iPhone 16 Pro is heavier, potentially impacting one-handed use.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without material information.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.676.3Poco F5 offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 24001206 x 2622iPhone 16 Pro has a sharper display with higher pixel density (460 vs 395 ppi).
Display TypeAMOLEDLTPO Super Retina XDR OLEDBoth are OLED offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. iPhone's LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)10002000iPhone 16 Pro's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm)Apple A18 Pro (3 nm)A18 Pro is expected to significantly outperform the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in both CPU and GPU tasks.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.91 GHz X2 + 3x2.49 GHz A710 + 4x1.8 GHz A510)Hexa-core (2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz)A18 Pro's architecture and higher clock speeds suggest superior multi-core performance.
RAM (GB)8/128While both offer ample RAM for most tasks, Poco F5 offers a 12GB option for even more demanding users.
OSAndroid 13iOS 18Different operating systems cater to different user preferences and ecosystems.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6448Megapixel count isn't everything; sensor size and processing play a larger role in image quality. Detailed comparison requires sensor size and other camera specs.
Ultrawide (MP)848iPhone's ultrawide offers much higher resolution.
Telephoto (MP)N/A12iPhone 16 Pro offers optical zoom capabilities, which Poco F5 lacks.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50003582Poco F5 has significantly larger battery capacity, likely resulting in longer battery life.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare charging speeds without specific data.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: More immersive for media consumption.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Lower Price: Offers great value for its performance.
  • Higher RAM Option: 12GB option provides headroom for future-proofing and multitasking.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly Faster Performance: A18 Pro chip offers superior processing power for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density for clearer visuals.
  • Brighter Display: Much better outdoor visibility.
  • Superior Camera System: Higher resolution ultrawide and the presence of a telephoto lens offer more versatile photography.
  • LTPO Display: More power efficient.
  • Faster USB Type-C Port: 3.2 Gen 2 vs 2.0 on the Poco F5. This translates to much faster data transfer speeds and potential for external display support.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display, long battery life, and good performance for everyday tasks. Suitable for media consumption, social media, and light gaming.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium camera system, and the latest iOS features. Ideal for power users, mobile gamers, photographers, and videographers.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The iPhone 16 Pro is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks and gaming, the iPhone 16 Pro is far superior.
  3. Which operating system do you prefer? Android and iOS offer distinct experiences.

My Choice: Apple iPhone 16 Pro

While the Poco F5 offers excellent value, the iPhone 16 Pro's superior performance, camera system, brighter and more power-efficient display, and faster USB port are decisive factors for me. I prioritize a smooth and powerful user experience, and the A18 Pro chip promises exactly that. The improved camera system with a telephoto lens significantly enhances photographic capabilities. While the smaller battery is a slight concern, the LTPO display mitigates this somewhat. The price difference is significant, but the overall package offered by the iPhone 16 Pro justifies the premium for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.