Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 204 g 189 g
Height 162.8 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.4 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 ProZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Poco F5 Pro is slightly smaller in height and width. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)204189ZTE is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality without material information.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible size difference.
Resolution1440 x 3200720 x 1612Poco F5 Pro offers significantly sharper visuals, better for media consumption and gaming. ZTE's lower resolution will result in pixelation and less detail.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzPoco F5 Pro's AMOLED provides richer colors, deeper blacks, and higher contrast. 120Hz refresh rate enables smoother scrolling and animations compared to ZTE's 90Hz.
BrightnessUp to 1400 nitsNot specifiedPoco F5 Pro's high peak brightness ensures better visibility in sunlight. Cannot compare without ZTE's brightness data.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Unisoc T606Poco F5 Pro boasts a flagship-level processor, ensuring significantly faster performance in demanding tasks, multitasking, and gaming. ZTE's budget processor will likely struggle with demanding applications.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Poco F5 Pro's CPU architecture is superior, delivering faster processing speeds and better efficiency.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G57 MP1Poco F5 Pro's GPU provides a much more powerful graphics rendering capability, essential for high-end gaming and smooth UI.
RAM8/12GB4/8GBPoco F5 Pro offers more RAM options for better multitasking and app performance.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.7950MP, f/1.8While ZTE has a high megapixel count, Poco F5 Pro's larger sensor and wider aperture likely deliver better low-light performance. Image quality depends on various factors beyond megapixels.
VideoUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsPoco F5 Pro offers significantly higher video resolution and frame rates, allowing for more detailed and smoother video recording.
Battery
Capacity5160 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities, expected to offer comparable battery life. Real-world usage will depend on optimization and individual use patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a flagship-level experience.
  • Much better display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate for vibrant visuals and smooth interactions.
  • Higher resolution: Sharper images and text, better for media consumption.
  • More versatile camera: Higher resolution video recording capabilities and potentially better low-light performance.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lighter weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Price: Poco F5 Pro offers significantly better performance but at a higher price. ZTE compromises performance for affordability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and versatile camera capabilities. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and content creation.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality for everyday tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Not recommended for demanding applications or heavy multimedia use.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The price difference is significant.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? (e.g., gaming, photography, social media)
  3. How important is performance and display quality to you?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Poco F5 Pro for its powerful hardware and smooth display.
  • Photographer/Videographer: Poco F5 Pro for its superior camera capabilities.
  • Budget-conscious user with basic needs: ZTE Blade A75 4G.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a lower price point, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the clear winner for me. The significantly superior performance, stunning AMOLED display with 120Hz, and more versatile camera capabilities justify the higher price. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, especially for tasks like gaming and multitasking, which the Poco F5 Pro excels at. The ZTE Blade A75 4G, while suitable for basic tasks, would likely frustrate me with its lower resolution display and budget processor. The lighter weight of the ZTE is a nice perk, but not enough to outweigh the significant advantages offered by the Poco F5 Pro.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.