Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 February 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 106.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 204 g 193 g
Height 162.8 mm 168.3 mm
Width 75.4 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Midnight Black
  • Forest Green (Olive Green)
  • Star Blue (Lake Blue)

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 500 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 46.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 730 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 ProXiaomi Redmi A3Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6168.3 x 76.3 x 8.3Poco F5 Pro is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)204193Redmi A3 is slightly lighter. Negligible difference in daily use.
BuildMissingMissingBuild quality and materials cannot be compared.
Display
Display Type6.67" AMOLED, 120Hz6.71" IPS LCD, 90HzPoco F5 Pro offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles due to AMOLED technology. Its higher refresh rate results in smoother animations and scrolling.
Resolution1440 x 3200720 x 1650Much sharper and more detailed visuals on the Poco F5 Pro. Redmi A3's resolution is noticeably lower.
PPI526268Significantly higher pixel density on Poco F5 Pro translates to sharper text and images.
Brightness1400 nits (peak)500 nits (HBM)Poco F5 Pro will be much more readable in direct sunlight.
HDRDolby Vision, HDR10+NoneSuperior dynamic range and color accuracy on the Poco F5 Pro when viewing HDR content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Mediatek Helio G36Poco F5 Pro boasts vastly superior processing power, enabling smooth multitasking, demanding gaming, and faster app loading.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53)Significant performance difference. Poco F5 Pro's CPU is built for high-end tasks.
GPUAdreno 730PowerVR GE8320Poco F5 Pro offers a much more powerful GPU, crucial for gaming and graphically intensive applications.
RAM8GB/12GB3GB/4GB/6GBMore RAM in the Poco F5 Pro allows for smoother multitasking and less frequent app reloading.
Camera
Rear Camera64MP (Main) + 8MP (Wide) + 2MP (Macro)8MP (Main) + 0.3MP (Unknown)Poco F5 Pro offers higher resolution main sensor, a wider angle lens, and likely better overall image quality. The purpose of the 0.3MP sensor on the Redmi A3 is unclear.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsPoco F5 Pro allows for much higher resolution video recording with better stabilization.
Front Camera16MP5MPHigher resolution selfie camera on the Poco F5 Pro.
Battery
Capacity5160 mAh5000 mAhSlightly larger battery on the Poco F5 Pro. Real-world battery life will depend on usage and optimization.
Charging SpeedMissingMissingCharging speeds cannot be compared due to missing information.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Superior chipset, CPU, GPU, and RAM for a smoother and faster experience.
  • Much better display: AMOLED with higher resolution, refresh rate, and HDR support.
  • More capable camera system: Higher resolution sensors, wider angle lens, and 8K video recording.

Xiaomi Redmi A3 Advantages:

  • Lower price: Positioned in the low-budget segment.
  • Slightly lighter: Negligible difference in real-world usage.

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi A3 sacrifices performance, display quality, and camera capabilities for affordability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and a versatile camera. Ideal for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and media consumption.

Xiaomi Redmi A3: Users on a tight budget who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and browsing. Not recommended for gaming or demanding applications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A3 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What do you primarily use your phone for? The Poco F5 Pro is better for demanding tasks, while the Redmi A3 suffices for basic use.
  3. How important is display and camera quality? The Poco F5 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi A3 in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Poco F5 Pro
  • Photographer/Videographer: Poco F5 Pro
  • Casual User on a Budget: Redmi A3
  • Power User: Poco F5 Pro

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

Reasoning: The Poco F5 Pro offers significantly better performance, a vastly superior display, and a more capable camera system. While the Redmi A3 is more affordable, the compromises in performance and features are too significant for my needs. I value a smooth and responsive user experience, a high-quality display for media consumption, and a good camera for capturing photos and videos. The Poco F5 Pro delivers on all these fronts, making it the clear winner for me. The price difference is justified by the substantial upgrade in overall quality and capabilities.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.