Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 204 g 192 g
Height 162.8 mm 168 mm
Width 75.4 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 600 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 ProXiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6168 x 78 x 8.1Poco F5 Pro is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)204192Poco C65 is slightly lighter but the difference is negligible in practical use.
BuildMissingMissingMaterial differences can impact durability and premium feel; information is lacking here.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.74Poco C65 has a marginally larger display.
Resolution1440 x 3200720 x 1600Significantly sharper and more detailed visuals on the Poco F5 Pro (526 ppi vs 260 ppi). Impacts clarity of text, images, and videos.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzF5 Pro offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors with AMOLED. The 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling compared to the 90Hz on the C65.
BrightnessUp to 1400 nitsUp to 600 nitsF5 Pro will be much more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Helio G85Massive performance difference. F5 Pro will handle demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking much more smoothly.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)F5 Pro has a significantly more powerful CPU architecture, resulting in faster processing speeds.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G52 MC2F5 Pro's GPU offers significantly better graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive applications.
RAM8GB/12GB6GB/8GBMore RAM on the F5 Pro allows for smoother multitasking and less frequent app closures in the background.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.7950MP, f/1.8While megapixel count is higher on F5 Pro, real-world image quality depends on sensor and processing. More details about sensor size and features are needed for proper comparison.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsF5 Pro offers significantly higher resolution video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity5160 mAh5000 mAhNegligible difference in battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on software optimization and usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides a massive performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate offers better color accuracy, contrast, and smoother visuals.
  • Higher resolution display: Much sharper and more detailed visuals.
  • Brighter Display: Better visibility in sunlight.
  • Higher resolution video recording: Up to 8K.

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Slightly lighter: Though the difference is minor in practice.

Trade-offs:

  • The Poco C65 sacrifices performance, display quality, and camera capabilities for affordability.
  • The Poco F5 Pro comes at a premium price for its high-end features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Power users, gamers, content creators, those who prioritize performance and a premium display.
  • Use Cases: Demanding mobile gaming, video editing, multitasking, consuming high-resolution media.

Xiaomi Poco C65:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users, casual users primarily focused on basic tasks like communication and web browsing. Those looking for a large screen at an affordable price.
  • Use Cases: Calling, texting, social media, web browsing, light gaming.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco C65 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Heavy gaming and content creation favor the F5 Pro, while basic tasks suffice for the C65.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The F5 Pro vastly outperforms the C65 in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget, basic usage: Poco C65
  • Prioritize performance and premium experience: Poco F5 Pro

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

While the Poco C65 offers excellent value for its price, I would choose the Poco F5 Pro. The superior performance, stunning AMOLED display with 120Hz, and higher resolution make it a much more compelling device for my needs. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, enjoy mobile gaming, and appreciate high-quality visuals. The price difference is justified by the significant upgrade in overall quality and capabilities. The F5 Pro's future-proofing with its powerful chipset is also a significant factor. While I acknowledge the C65's value proposition for budget-conscious buyers, the F5 Pro offers a more comprehensive and enjoyable smartphone experience in the long run.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.