Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs vivo X100 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 109.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.07 "/g
Weight 204 g 221 g
Height 162.8 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.4 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • White
  • Sunset Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 117.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 49.1 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5400 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Adreno 730 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 Provivo X100 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9Vivo is slightly taller and thicker. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)204221Poco is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.78Vivo offers a slightly larger screen, providing a more immersive experience for media consumption.
Resolution1440 x 32001260 x 2800Poco has a sharper display (526 ppi vs 452 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Panel TypeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Vivo's LTPO panel allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)14003000Vivo's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Dimensity 9300Both are high-performance chipsets. Dimensity 9300 is newer and boasts power efficiency improvements. Real-world performance differences might be minimal for average users but could favor the Dimensity 9300 in sustained heavy tasks.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)The Dimensity 9300 utilizes the newer Cortex-X4 and Cortex-A720 cores, potentially offering better performance per watt.
GPUAdreno 730Immortalis-G720 MC12Gaming performance should be excellent on both. More benchmarks are needed to definitively compare the Immortalis-G720 to the Adreno 730.
RAM8/12GB16GBVivo offers more RAM in its configuration, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera64MP Omnivision OV64B50MP Sony IMX989Vivo uses a larger sensor (1-inch), potentially capturing more light and detail, especially in low-light conditions. DXOMARK score of 150 supports this.
Ultrawide8MP50MPVivo has a significantly higher resolution ultrawide, capturing more detail.
Telephoto2MP Macro50MP with 4.3x Optical ZoomVivo offers a dedicated telephoto lens with optical zoom, enabling better quality zoomed shots compared to Poco's macro lens.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)51605400Vivo has a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life.
Charging SpeedInformation missingInformation missingCannot compare charging speeds without specific details.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher pixel density for crisper visuals.
  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable.

vivo X100 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Camera System: Larger main sensor, high-resolution ultrawide, dedicated telephoto lens with optical zoom, and higher DXOMARK score.
  • Brighter Display: Better visibility outdoors.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • More RAM: Enhanced multitasking capabilities.
  • Newer Chipset & CPU: Potential for better performance and efficiency.
  • Faster USB Standard: USB 3.2 offers faster data transfer speeds compared to USB 2.0.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a sharp display and smooth performance for everyday tasks, gaming, and media consumption. Less demanding photographers would also find the camera system adequate.

vivo X100 Pro: Best suited for users who demand top-tier camera capabilities, a bright and vibrant display, and excellent overall performance. The extra RAM is beneficial for power users who multitask heavily.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F5 Pro offers excellent value for its price.
  2. Is camera quality a top priority? The Vivo X100 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco in this area.
  3. Do you need the absolute best performance and latest hardware? The Vivo X100 Pro utilizes a newer chipset, CPU architecture and offers more RAM.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Focus on Gaming: Poco F5 Pro
  • Photography Enthusiast: Vivo X100 Pro
  • Power User, Heavy Multitasking: Vivo X100 Pro

My Choice: vivo X100 Pro

While the Poco F5 Pro offers great value, the vivo X100 Pro's superior camera system, brighter display, larger battery, more RAM and newer processor make it the more compelling device for me. I prioritize camera quality and having the latest technology, and I am willing to pay the premium for the Vivo X100 Pro's significant advantages in these areas. The future-proofing offered by the newer chipset and more RAM also factors into my decision. The lighter weight of the Poco is tempting, but the overall package of the Vivo wins out.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.