Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Tecno Pova 6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 April 4, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 99.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 204 g 198 g
Height 162.8 mm 165.5 mm
Width 75.4 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Comet Green
  • Meteorite Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 1080 x 2436
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 87.2 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 130.52 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 60.3 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 ProTecno Pova 6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6165.5 x 76.1 x 7.9Poco F5 Pro is slightly smaller and thinner. Pova 6 Pro might feel slightly larger in hand.
Weight (g)204198Negligible weight difference in practical use.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.78Pova 6 Pro has a slightly larger display, offering more screen real estate.
Resolution1440 x 32001080 x 2436Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly sharper display (526 ppi vs 393 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling with 120Hz. Poco F5 Pro supports Dolby Vision and HDR10+ for superior dynamic range and color accuracy in compatible content.
Peak Brightness (nits)14001300Poco F5 Pro can get slightly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)Dimensity 6080 (6nm)Poco F5 Pro features a significantly more powerful processor, resulting in smoother performance in demanding tasks and games.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)The Poco F5 Pro's CPU architecture is more modern and powerful.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G57 MC2Poco F5 Pro has a much stronger GPU, leading to significantly better gaming performance and graphics rendering.
RAM8/12GB6/12GBBoth offer ample RAM, but the Poco F5 Pro's 12GB option provides more headroom for multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.79, OIS108MP, f/1.7While the Pova 6 Pro has a higher resolution sensor, the Poco F5 Pro includes Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for steadier shots and videos, potentially leading to better overall image quality.
Video Recording8K@24fps, 4K@60fps1440p@30fpsPoco F5 Pro offers superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity5160 mAh6000 mAhPova 6 Pro has a larger battery, likely resulting in longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks, gaming, and future-proofing.
  • Sharper and more vibrant display: Higher resolution and Dolby Vision/HDR10+ support provide a superior visual experience.
  • Superior video recording: 8K and 4K@60fps recording options offer greater flexibility and quality.
  • OIS for better photos and videos: Image stabilization results in sharper images, especially in low light and when recording video.

Tecno Pova 6 Pro Advantages:

  • Larger battery: Potentially significantly longer battery life for extended usage.
  • Slightly larger display: More screen real estate for media consumption and multitasking.

Trade-offs:

  • Pova 6 Pro: Sacrifices performance and display quality for a larger battery and lower price.
  • Poco F5 Pro: Smaller battery capacity compared to the Pova 6 Pro.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and excellent camera capabilities. Suitable for demanding tasks, mobile gaming, and content creation.

Tecno Pova 6 Pro: Best suited for users who prioritize long battery life and a large display for media consumption. A good option for budget-conscious users with less demanding usage patterns.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F5 Pro is generally more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? (Gaming, photography, media consumption, general use)
  3. How important is battery life versus performance?

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

While the Tecno Pova 6 Pro offers a larger battery and attractive price point, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the superior device overall. The significant difference in processing power, display quality, and camera capabilities (especially with OIS) outweighs the Pova 6 Pro's advantages in battery capacity and screen size for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, a vibrant display for media consumption, and the ability to capture high-quality photos and videos. The Poco F5 Pro delivers on all these fronts, making it a more compelling choice despite the smaller battery. I'm willing to sacrifice a bit of battery life for significantly better performance and overall user experience. The inclusion of OIS is a critical factor, as it significantly improves image and video quality in various scenarios.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.